Display Tech, Wary of Swooping Vultures, Adopts Poison Pill

Appin, Rick
September 1999
Mergers & Acquisitions Report;09/20/99, Vol. 12 Issue 37, p12
Reports the implementation of the antitakeover strategy by Display Technologies, Inc. (DTI) for fear of takeout by larger competitors. Information on the nature and business operation of the firm; Analysis of William Bradner of Auerbach, Pollak & Richardson company on the rumor; Products manufactured by DTI; Revenue earned by DTI for the second quarter of 1999.


Related Articles

  • Pill foes claim some victories.  // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;Jan2000, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p18 

    Focuses on the efforts of institutional investors and opponents of poison pills to fight public companies' capital structures of the antitakeover defense in 1999. Ranks of firms installing shareholder rights plans; Increased incidence of hostile bids in the merger and acquisition market;...

  • Poison pills: 1980s vs. 1990s. Lee, Sharon K.; Pawlukiewicz, James E. // American Business Review;Jan2000, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p28 

    Provides evidence on the effect of a restrictive takeover defense such as poison pills on shareholders. Comparison on poison pill plans rates from the 1982-87 and the 1990-95 group; Significance of poison pills on stock holders; Wealth effects on the announcement of poison pill plans.

  • CA readies to launch 'nuclear option'. Harrell, Jeremy // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);10/20/2006, Vol. 53 Issue 44, p5A 

    The article reports that Islandia, New York-based software company CA Inc. has adopted a new "poison pill" provision designed to thwart unwanted buyout bids. Poison pills, officially called shareholder protection plans or something similar, function by making a company prohibitively expensive...

  • Poison-pill tax ruling aids shareholders.  // Corporate Board;Jul/Aug90, Vol. 11 Issue 63, p26 

    Reports on a ruling by the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) clarifying the tax standing of poison pill plans, a device used by companies seeking to prevent hostile takeovers. Clarification of the standing of poison pill plans; Other IRS rulings that fortify the ability of companies to defend...

  • Marriott shareholders asked to reject anti-takeover package.  // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;03/09/98, Issue 322274, p16 

    Reveals the anti-takeover measures proposed by shareholders of Marriott International. Establishment of a classified board; Creation of a poison pill provision; Creation of dual classes of common stock.

  • Yahoo! Hears Takeover Footsteps.  // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;Apr2001, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p14 

    Reports on Internet search engine Yahoo! Inc.'s use of the poison pill strategy to discourage hostile takeovers. Worth of the company's stocks; Financial problems facing Yahoo!; Other Internet companies that used the poison pill strategy.

  • Tidewater, Solectron Scuttle Pills.  // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;Jan2007, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p13 

    The article reports that two more poison pills were snuffed out at publicly held companies Tidewater and Solectron in the U.S. in November 2006. Offshore oil services firm Tidewater let its shareholder rights plan expire while electronics manufacturer Solectron dropped its pill about five years...

  • THE ENDURING ILLEGITIMACY OF THE POISON PILL. Velasco, Julian // Journal of Corporation Law;Spring2002, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p381 

    Discusses the invalidity of the poison pill in the United States. Authorization for corporate management to entrench at the expense of shareholders; Encouragement of discrimination among shareholders; Bestowal of shareholders' rights to buy shares in the acquiring company; Utilization of the...

  • Preventing control from the grave: A proposal for judicial treatment of dead hand provisions in... Lese, Shawn C. // Columbia Law Review;Dec96, Vol. 96 Issue 8, p2175 

    Analyzes the shareholder rights plan (poison pill) as a potent defense against corporate raiders in the United States. The negative effects on voting rights of the Continuing Directors provision in `poison pills'; Review of corporate jurisprudence on shareholder's electoral franchise.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics