TITLE

Public Shunning

AUTHOR(S)
Weinberg, Neil
PUB. DATE
October 2006
SOURCE
Forbes Asia;10/30/2006, Vol. 2 Issue 18, p32
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article ponders on a U.S. corporate trend in 2006 wherein CEOs are avoiding membership to public boards. Waste of time is one reason why CEOs are not interested in serving on a public board. There are also CEOs who think that it is easier to build a successful business when it is private. Other corporate trends include the privatization of blue-chip companies and the penetration by foreign companies of public markets.
ACCESSION #
23061405

 

Related Articles

  • Auswirkungen von Mehrfachmandaten deutscher Vorstands- und Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender auf den Unternehmenserfolg. Balsmeier, Benjamin; Buchwald, Achim; Peters, Heiko // Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie & Statistik;2010, Vol. 230 Issue 5, p547 

    Members of management boards as well as supervisory boards often attract public criticism when they are simultaneously active in several other boards. We use a panel data set of the biggest German corporations for the period from 1996-2006 to estimate the impact of multiple board memberships of...

  • Directors, Directors and Officers Insurance, and Corporate Governance. MacMinn, Richard; Ren, Yayuan; Li-Ming Han // Journal of Insurance Issues;Fall2012, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p159 

    This article models a board of directors consisting of either pure directors or shareholder directors. Pure directors only receive a fee for their service to the board, while shareholder directors receive corporate equity in addition to the fee. The analysis shows that: (1)...

  • COMMENT: THE CASE FOR REAL SHAREHOLDER DEMOCRACY. Dent, George // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Spring2005, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p581 

    Focuses on the argument that the corporate governance system is flawed, that many boards of directors are heavily influenced or dominated by the chief executive officer so that the company is not managed with the goal of maximizing shareholder wealth. Proposal that the nomination of the...

  • Smart Talk.  // BRW;8/2/2012, Vol. 34 Issue 30, p15 

    The article shares some tips on setting up an effective corporate board. According to the author, a bad board can be toxic to the company, while good board mentors backs up chief executives at the same time asks hard questions. He points out that the size of a board is inversely proportional to...

  • In splitting leadership, look at CEO ownership. Simon, Dennis // Directors & Boards;Winter2004, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p24 

    Reports on the separation of the chairman and the chief executive officer roles and responsibilities between two individuals in the U.S. Influence of business ownership to the strategic oversight of the business enterprise; Change in the corporate governance structure of public companies;...

  • Take the High Ground On Director Selection. Lohnes, Jack // Directors & Boards;Spring91, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p33 

    The article presents author's views on the growing importance of selecting board of directors based on the requirements of institutional investors. It reflects that since the last 15 years the best way to select a director has been when a chief executive officer leads the screening and then uses...

  • Your board's 'inner circle'. Dailey, Patrick R.; Bishop Jr., Charles H. // Directors & Boards;2009 4th Quarter, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p19 

    The article provides information on the coalition of informal subgroup within the full board of directors tagged as the 'inner circle' around the chairman or chief executive. It notes that the inner circle comprises three or four members with empowerment ceding to the chief executive during good...

  • CHAPTER 2: THE GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN CORPORATIONS. Kaen, Fred R. // Blueprint for Corporate Governance;2003, p17 

    Chapter 2 of the book "Blueprint of Corporate Governance" is presented. The governance structure of U.S. corporation is such that the owners who are the shareholders and investors, can make decisions on the assets and daily operation of the firm or they can appoint a board which serves the best...

  • SAY GOODBYE TO UNDERPERFORMING DIRECTORS. Susie, Joan // Bank Director;2013 1st Quarter, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p8 

    In this article the author discusses the issue of underperforming board members and how best to move or replace those directors who are no longer effective. She notes that some banks have difficulty dealing with directors who can no longer keep up due to their past services and the friendships...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics