TITLE

Reducing recycling's risks: Share the pain, share the gain

AUTHOR(S)
Keller, Richard
PUB. DATE
January 1998
SOURCE
World Wastes;Jan1998, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p42
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses ways of reducing risks in recycling solid wastes. Cost of operations; Construction of a contract that shares the results of the business operation; Holding of a pre-bid conference prior to accepting bids; Pricing; Contract and risk decisions; Collection and processing. INSET: Is the bid `too good to be true?'..
ACCESSION #
230269

 

Related Articles

  • Demystifying the Great Biosolids Debate. Chrostowski, Paul C. // Pollution Engineering;Aug2002, Vol. 34 Issue 8, p23 

    Explores the debate concerning the beneficial recycling of biosolids in the U.S. Potential health effects of exposure to biosolids; Wastewater treatment; Use of recycled biosolids as fertilizers; Exposure to toxic ammonia.

  • Recycling Norms. Carlson, Ann E. // California Law Review;Oct2001, Vol. 89 Issue 5, p1231 

    Examines empirical evidence about a particular large-number, small-payoff collective action problem, solid waste reduction through recycling to determine whether and how social norms work to induce behavioral change. Definition of social norms; Recycling in historical and contemporary...

  • Three solid waste reporting workshops offered in June.  // South Carolina Business Journal;Jun2000, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p4 

    Reports on the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control and the Recycling Market Development Advisory Council's workshops designed to assist industries and local governments in reporting their efforts to reduce solid waste and their recycling goals. Provisions under the...

  • Recycling olive mill residuals in Andalusia.  // BioCycle;Jun95, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p24 

    Reports on the recycling of olive mill wastewater (OMW) in Spain. Report from F. Cabrera of the Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia de Sevilla in Seville, Spain; Benefits of agronomic application of OMW.

  • Targeting business categories. Stevens, Barbara; Kusterer, Thomas // BioCycle;Jul95, Vol. 36 Issue 7, p61 

    Reports on the importance of focusing resources on high refuse generators and specific materials as a cost-effective approach to commercial recycling. Examination of waste streams of specific types of commercial generators to target materials for recovery using the sector analysis method; Waste...

  • Public perception is key to biosolids acceptance. Draman, Grace A. // BioCycle;Sep95, Vol. 36 Issue 9, p82 

    Reports on the importance of public perception in issues or projects relating to the environment especially propagation of biosolids utilization. Need for public education and awareness programs; Benefits of biosolids recycling; Problems to be resolved; Includes Not In My Backyard (NIMBY)...

  • Industrial reuse & recycling. Golueke, Clarence // BioCycle;Oct95, Vol. 36 Issue 10, p29 

    Presents an abstract of the study `Recycling and Reuse of Industrial Wastes,' by L.J. Means Smith and E. Barth.

  • Public policy and recycling. Golueke, Clarence // BioCycle;May98, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p28 

    Presents an abstract of the research titled `Packaging, Recycling, and Solid Waste, Policy Study 223,' by L. Scarlett, R. McCann, et al.

  • INDUSTRY NEWS.  // BioCycle;Nov2001, Vol. 42 Issue 11, p71 

    Presents news briefs on the organic recycling industry as of November 2001. Growth rate in the world markets for wastewater in 2000; Alliance of N-Viro International with Soil Preparation Inc.; Features of the turn-key bagging system from Rotochopper, called Go-Bagger.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics