A conclusion based on an unwise premise

February 1997
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;02/15/97, Vol. 156 Issue 4, p484
Academic Journal
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • TRUTH VS. NECESSARY TRUTH IN ARISTOTLE'S SCIENCES. Upton, Thomas V. // Review of Metaphysics;Jun2004, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p741 

    Suggests a textually based interpretation of the truth and demonstrative science of Aristotle. Explanation on the concept of true scientific premises; Problem with true premises as the bases for necessary conclusions; Difference of Aristotle's account of the difference between opinion and...

  • The Discursive Dilemma in Monetary Policy. Clausseny, Carl Andreas; Røislandz, Øistein // Monetary Policy Report (Norges Bank);Jun2010, Vol. 2, p1 

    The discursive dilemma implies that the policy decision of a board of policymakers depends on whether the board reaches the decision by voting directly on policy (conclusion–based procedure), or by voting on the premises for the decision (premise–based procedure). We derive results...

  • Who Needs Valid Moral Arguments? (Dedicated to the Memory of R.M. Chisholm, 1916—1999 ). Nelson, Mark T. // Argumentation;2003, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p35 

    Why have so many philosophers agonised over the possibility of valid arguments from factual premises to moral conclusions? I suggest that they have done so, because of worries over a sceptical argument that has as one of its premises, `All moral knowledge must be non-inferential, or, if...

  • Induction as conditional probabifity judgment. Blok, Sergey V.; Medin, Douglas L.; Osherson, Daniel N. // Memory & Cognition;Sep2007, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p1353 

    Existing research on category-based induction has primarily focused on reasoning about blank properties, or predicates that are designed to elicit little prior knowledge. Here, we address reasoning about nonblank properties. We introduce a model of conditional probability that assumes that the...

  • A distorted look at UK crime spots.  // Mail on Sunday;8/25/2013, p95 

    Your recent article on Britain's crime hotspots did not take into account two fundamental issues that significantly distorted the conclusions. First, the analysis was based on the premise that Westfield centres are covered by a single postcode. They are not.

  • Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case. Nehring, Klaus; Puppe, Clemens // Social Choice & Welfare;Jun2008, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p41 

    Generalizing the celebrated “discursive dilemma”, we analyze judgement aggregation problems in which a group of agents independently votes on a set of complex propositions (the “conclusions”) and on a set of “premises” by which the conclusions are...

  • Belief-based and analytic processing in transitive inference depends on premise integration difficulty. ANDREWS, GLENDA // Memory & Cognition;Oct2010, Vol. 38 Issue 7, p928 

    Three experiments investigated belief-based versus analytic processing in transitive inference. Belief-based and analytic processing were inferred from conclusion acceptance rates for problems with conclusions that were either valid or invalid and believable or unbelievable. Premise integration...

  • FIRE AND INDUSTRIAL SAFETY (CIVIL ENGINEERING). Sklyarov, K. A.; Sushko, Ye. A.; Khudikovsky, V. L.; Manokhin, V. Ya. // Scientific Herald of the Voronezh State University of Architectu;2013, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p72 

    Statement of the problem. At present, the approach to the modelling of smoke extraction system based on static model of fire is widely used. In this model, heat and smoke emissions are considered to be constant. However, a static model does not allow one to assess the propagation of smoke gases...

  • Classifications: On Philosophers and Librarians. Bettella, Cristiana; Carrara, Massimiliano // Knowledge Organization;2009, Vol. 36 Issue 2/3, p88 

    Consider the following argument: (Premise 1) If a librarian is a classifier and (Premise 2) a librarian classifies (among the other things) the documents of a library, and (Premise 3) to classify documents is equivalent to classifying the objects of a knowledge base, but (Premise 4) to classify...

  • In the aftermath of Johnson and Eichman: The Constitution... Kmiec, Douglas W. // Brigham Young University Law Review;1990, Vol. 1990 Issue 2, p577 

    Illustrates the reason why it is unwise to amend the Constitution to correct the erroneous conclusions of the Johnson and Eichman majorities. Discussion of whether a constitutional flag protection statute might be drafted; conclusion that a viable statutory alternative may exit if the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics