The Ends of Science

Cohen, Eric
November 2006
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Nov2006, Issue 167, p27
The article discusses the relationship of scientists with religion. Many scientists are frustrated with policy dictating their work and with a lack of funding, as is the case with stem-cell research. Both scientists and theologists struggle to lay claims on the origins of man and nature. While many religious believers are strong faith advocates, some scientists exaggerate the claim that Darwinism explains everything about humans.


Related Articles

  • Evolution, Religion and Free Will. Graffin, Gregory W.; Provine, William B. // American Scientist;Jul/Aug2007, Vol. 95 Issue 4, p294 

    The article provides information on a study on eminent evolutionists and their views on religion. Comprised of 17 questions and space for optional comments, the survey addressed many more issues than the earlier polls. Perhaps the most revealing question in the poll asked the respondent to...

  • Why Evolution Is the Organizing Principle for Biology. Zimmerman, Michael // Phi Kappa Phi Forum;Spring2009, Vol. 89 Issue 1, p4 

    The article provides an explanation on why the theory of evolution formulated by scientist Charles Darwin is considered as the organizing principle for biology. It notes that Darwin's reasoning on the theory of natural selection is being adopted by biologists. It also cites the statement of...

  • Neo-Darwinism and Religion. Goodheart, Eugene // Society;Mar/Apr2008, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p125 

    In recent decades, the humanities have been in thrall to postmodern skepticism, whereas Darwinism, brimming with confidence in the genuine progress they have made in the sciences of biology and psychology, have set their sights on rescuing the humanities from the ravages of postmodernism. In...

  • The Design of Evolution. Barr, Stephen M. // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Oct2005, Issue 156, p9 

    Comments on cardinal Christoph Schönborn's criticism of the theory of neo-Darwinism. Catholic theologians' stance on the theory of the evolution of plants and animals; Negative reaction of Schönborn to the suggestion that the Catholic Church has no problem with the notion of evolution;...

  • Monkey See, Monkey Do. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek;8/15/2005, Vol. 146 Issue 7, p27 

    Comments on the theory of intelligent design (ID). Reference to the debate over Darwin in the Kansas schools; Suggestion that one of the reasons the U.S. has fewer science majors is the right-wing notion that conventional biology is vaguely atheistic; Approach of U.S. President George W. Bush...

  • The Life Science Prize. Zimmerman, Michael // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep-Dec2005, Vol. 25 Issue 5/6, p33 

    The article discusses the authors experience in competing with a creation scientist for a Life Science Prize offered by Teno Groppi and his friends. The challenge offers $20,000 dollars to an evolutionist to prove that evolution is science and that creation is religion and awards the same amount...

  • Andy Rooney and Prayer. Abbott, Serge Evangelos // Culture & Religion Review Journal;2011, Vol. 2011 Issue 1, p115 

    The article offers the author's insights regarding the things he believes in the context of religion in contrast with the things that he did not believes in the context of science, such as his idea on Christian churches, the theory of evolution, and wars.

  • EXPELLED ERRORS: Science and Religion. Scott, Eugenie C.; Hess, Peter M. J. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep-Dec2008, Vol. 28 Issue 5/6, p49 

    The article discusses the discusses the incompatibility between evolution and religion. It states that scientists are atheists which are linked to advocacy of evolution and reinforcing the conspiracy of repressing intelligent design and were characterized with inaccurate and dishonest strategy...

  • Scientists, Evolution, Religion. SMITH, LAWRENCE M. // America;3/18/1922, Vol. 26 Issue 22, p513 

    The author reflects on the modern scientific investigation, evolution and religion. He asserts that writers in magazines are inconsistent in their treatment of religion and science. He explains the failure of the German rationalistic school of historical criticism to draw conclusion on Christian...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics