TITLE

Monetary and nonmonetary accountability following adverse medical events: options for Canadian patients

AUTHOR(S)
Gray, John; Beilby, William
PUB. DATE
October 2006
SOURCE
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;10/10/2006, Vol. 175 Issue 8, p904
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the legal issues concerning medical malpractice in Canada. According to a study by Bismark and colleagues, patients harmed in the course of receiving medical care seek justice based on different motivations. There are three potential responses given by the Canadian medical system to patients seeking legal claims: patient safety response, professional accountability response and tort-based litigation.
ACCESSION #
22736797

 

Related Articles

  • Physician and Hospital Liability in Cases of Medical Negligence: A Comment on Professional Services, Inc. v. Agana. Patdu, Ivy D. // Ateneo Law Journal;Jun2007, Vol. 52 Issue 1, p219 

    The article focuses on the court case Professional Service Inc. v. Agana vis-àa-vis physician and hospital liability in cases of medical negligence. The case involved 2 sponges left inside the patient after operations were performed, causing the demise of the patient. According to the...

  • "Best Interests": Towards a more Patient-Friendly Law? Stewart, Angus // Edinburgh Law Review;Jan2007, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p62 

    The article discusses the authoritative test for medical negligence in Scots law as laid down by Lord President Clyde in Hunter v. Hanley. It explores the hypothesis that a particular aspect of Clyde's test takes on fresh relevance in the contemporary context of patient-centered standards. It...

  • BELIEVING SIX IMPROBABLE THINGS: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND "LEGAL FEAR' Hyman, David A.; Silver, Charles // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Fall2004, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p107 

    Explores the sub-claims of Philip Howard regarding medical malpractice and considers how well the sub-claims correspond to what is actually known about the performance of the U.S. medical malpractice system. Encouragement for the health care providers to hide their mistakes; Impact of liability...

  • Medical Malpractice Litigation: Ten Things They Didn't Tell You.  // Review of Ophthalmology;Oct2007, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p68 

    The article discusses some actions that can minimize the impact of medical malpractice litigation. Surgeons' best protection from medical malpractice litigation is one's discipline in following the best surgical practices. If there is a secret to preventing allegations of malpractice, it is...

  • Clinical negligence and patient compensation. Martin, Jeannett // Nursing Standard;3/2/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 25, p35 

    This article reviews the aims and purposes of the tort system in clinical negligence and outlines the main criticisms of the way the system provides compensation to patients. Other methods of providing compensation that could better meet the needs of patients, while still ensuring professional...

  • New law to improve patient safety.  // Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand;Aug2004, Vol. 10 Issue 7, p6 

    Reports that proposed changes to the medical misadventure provisions in the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2001 were introduced to New Zealand's Parliament in August 2004. Intention to improve patient safety and make rules simpler and fairer; Proposal to replace the term...

  • Malpractice and the Quality of Care. Brook, Robert H.; Williams, Kathleen N. // Annals of Internal Medicine;Jun78, Vol. 88 Issue 6, p836 

    Editorial. Discusses the relationship between medical malpractice and the quality of medical care in the U.S. Impact of the issue of malpractice on the medical care system; Overview of a report on medical professional liability by the American Bar Association Commission on Medical Professional...

  • State legislators tackle tort reform.  // Contemporary OB/GYN;Apr2004, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p18 

    The article deals with legislative developments on tort reform among U.S. states as of April 2004. A committee of the Connecticut state legislature held a hearing on a package of bills designed to reduce malpractice premiums. Physicians were not satisfied although state representatives in South...

  • Medical Malpractice: Effects of Varying Laws in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia: HEHS-00-5. Scanlon, William J. // GAO Reports;10/15/1999, p1 

    Many states changed their tort law in the past 25 years in order to reduce malpractice insurance premiums, but the evidence of the effect of the changes is too limited to allow reliable cost savings estimates. Maryland and Virginia both adopted tort reform--albeit using different approaches--but...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics