TITLE

Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience

AUTHOR(S)
Bismark, Marie; Dauer, Edward; Paterson, Ron; Studdert, David
PUB. DATE
October 2006
SOURCE
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;10/10/2006, Vol. 175 Issue 8, p889
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Unlike Canada's medical malpractice system, patients in New Zealand who are dissatisfied with the quality of their care may choose between 2 well-established medicolegal paths: one leads to monetary compensation and the other to nonmonetary forms of accountability. We compared the forms of accountability sought by patients and families in New Zealand who took different types of legal action following a medical injury. This study offers insights into the forms of accountability sought by injured patients and may help to inform tort-reform initiatives. Methods: We reviewed compensation claims submitted to the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), New Zealand's national no-fault insurer, following injuries associated with admission to a public hospital in 1998 (n= 582). We also reviewed complaint letters ( n= 254) submitted to the national Health and Disability Commissioner (HDC) that same year to determine the forms of accountability sought by injured patients. We used univariable and multivariable analyses to compare sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics of patients who sought nonmonetary forms of accountability with those of patients who claimed compensation. Results: Of 154 injured patients whose complaints were sufficiently detailed to allow coding, 50% sought corrective action to prevent similar harm to future patients (45% system change, 6% review of involved clinician's competence) and 40% wanted more satisfying communication (34% explanation, 10% apology). The odds that patients would seek compensation were significantly increased if they were in their prime working years (aged between 30 and 64 years) (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.41) or had a permanent disability as a result of their injury (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.14-2.70). When injuries resulted in death, the odds of a compensation claim to the ACC were about one-eighth those of a complaint to the HDC (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08-0.23). Interpretation: Injured patients who pursue medicolegal action seek various forms of accountability. Compensation is important to some, especially when economic losses are substantial (e.g., with injury during prime working years or severe nonfatal injuries). However, others have purely nonmonetary goals, and ensuring alternative options for redress would be an efficient and effective response to their needs.
ACCESSION #
22736794

 

Related Articles

  • How about a no-fault medical malpractice act? Moore, W. Henson; Stieglitz, A. Blackwell; Gomez, Maria Isabel // ABA Journal;Jan1985, Vol. 71 Issue 1, p37 

    Discusses issues pertaining to the proposed Alternative Medical Liability Act in the United States which was introduced to create a no-fault system of compensating victims of medical malpractice. Provisions of the bills; Description of economic loss; Views from two lawyers on the merits and...

  • Toward a Theory of Medical Malpractice. Stein, Alex // Iowa Law Review;May2012, Vol. 97 Issue 4, p1201 

    The article offers information on a theory explaining the functioning of medical malpractice system and guiding its reform. It mentions the theory of covering the mechanisms employed by medical malpractice law to impose, restrict and expanding of liability of care provider and consists of entry...

  • Compensation for medical accidents. Capstick, Brian; Edwards, Peter; Mason, David // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);1/26/91, Vol. 302 Issue 6770, p230 

    Focuses on the liability of medical practitioners to the patients in relation to medical malpractice in Great Britain. Debates concerning the emergence of birth asphyxia in obstetrics; Distinction of Rosemary Barnes in the legislation for the issue; Scrutiny on the cost settlement for the...

  • Effort on to raise malpractice pain-and-suffering cap. Toledano, Jessica // Orange County Business Journal;02/22/99, Vol. 28 Issue 8, p39 

    Talks about the debate over the plan to increase the amount to cover pain and suffering as a result of medical malpractice in California. Argument of doctors; Higher malpractice premiums; Alleged payback for all the large campaign donations the attorneys gave to key Democrats and Governor Gray...

  • The injustice of compensation for victims of medical accidents. Harris, John // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);06/21/97, Vol. 314 Issue 7097, p1821 

    Looks at the injustice in the compensation system for victims of medical malpractice in Great Britain. British law on this issue; Questions concerning justice and compensation; Possible strategies for practical improvements in the compensation system.

  • Attorney General v. Johnson.  // American Journal of Law & Medicine;Fall78, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p283 

    Reports on a Maryland Court of Appeals' ruling on a case involving medical malpractice. Details of the case; Legal precedents; Implications for medical laws and legislation.

  • Malpractice consult. Johnson, Lee J. // Medical Economics;02/07/2000, Vol. 77 Issue 3, p176 

    Presents answers to queries related to malpractice liability of medical personnel. Releasing of a child's medical records while there is an existing joint custody arrangement; Separate liability policies for nurses.

  • Medical-Malpractice Tort Reform Trouble Spots. Goch, Lynna // Best's Review;Dec2002, Vol. 103 Issue 8, p52 

    Focuses on the problems of the Medical-Malpractice Tort Reform in the U.S. Demonstration of high medical-liability premiums for physicians; Closure of medical practices statewide; Shortages of doctors.

  • Medical-Malpractice Reform: On the Way to Recovery.  // Best's Review;Dec2002, Vol. 103 Issue 8, p52 

    Reports on the recovery of the reform for medical-malpractice in the U.S. Chances of orthopedics and obstetrics in dealing medical liability claim; Maintenance of jury awards from reaching unreasonable levels; Prevention of any unrelated and unpopular rules.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics