TITLE

Synopsys Asks to Subpoena Mentor in Magma Case

AUTHOR(S)
Mutschler, Ann Steffora
PUB. DATE
October 2006
SOURCE
Electronic News;10/2/2006, Vol. 52 Issue 40, p37
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the action taken by Synopsis Inc. to re-open its case against rival company Magma Design Automation in relation to Mentor Graphics Corporation's request to reexamine two Synopsis patents. This case will be heard by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 20, 2006. An overview of the case is provided.
ACCESSION #
22690404

 

Related Articles

  • Magma Claims Patents in Synopsys Dispute Jointly Owned by IBM. Mutschler, Ann Steffora // Electronic News;10/31/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 44, pN.PAG 

    This article reports on a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Synopsys Inc. against Magma Design Automation Inc. in September 2005. Magma Design is seeking a summary judgment from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California based on its findings that Synopsys' claim is...

  • Synopsys Loses Battle in Patent War.  // Electronic News;6/5/2006, Vol. 52 Issue 23, p9 

    The article reports on the ruling of U.S. District Judge in Delaware Gregory Sleet denying motions filed by Synopsys in a patent infringement case against Magma Design Automation. The motions filed by Synopsys aimed to dismiss Magma's claims and to consider the antitrust and patent infringement...

  • Synopsys Claims Magma Stole Technology. Sperling, Ed // Electronic News;1/17/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 3, pN.PAG 

    Reports on a lawsuit filed by Synopsys against Magma Design Automation in September 2004 regarding the timing closure technology patent developed by Lukas van Ginneken. Action taken by Magma Design to resolve the issue according to Milan Lazich, vice president of corporate marketing for Magma.

  • Court Deals Magma a Blow in Synopsys Litigation. Mutschler, Ann Steffora // Electronic News;12/12/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 50, pN.PAG 

    The article presents an update on the legal battle between Synopsys Inc. and Magma Design Automation as of December 2005. The case is about the design tool patents invented by Lukas van Ginneken, who have worked in both companies. It is reported here that the Federal District Court for the...

  • PTO to re-examine third patent in Synopsys/Magma war. Taylor, Colleen // Electronic News;1/22/2007, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p5 

    the article reports on a final patent at issue in a lawsuit filed by Magma Design Automation Inc. against Synopsis Inc. that was accepted for re-examination after the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in January 2007. An office action rejecting all 15 patent claims was issued by the PTO....

  • PTO Looks Again at Patent in Magma/Synopsys Feud. Taylor, Colleen // Electronic News;12/11/2006, Vol. 52 Issue 50, p10 

    The article reports that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will reexamine Patent No. 6,725,438, one of three patents at issue in a patent case between Magma Design Automation Inc. and Synopsys Inc. The ownership of the patents was the subject of the U.S. District Court for the Northern...

  • PTO to re-examine third patent in Synopsys/Magma war. Taylor, Colleen // Electronic News;1/15/2007, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p50 

    The article reports on the agreement of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to re-examine the third and final patent at issue in the lawsuit of Magma Design Automation Inc. with Synopsys Inc. The PTO ordered reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,453,446, the third patent at issue in the...

  • Synopsys Sues Magma.  // Electronic News;9/20/2004, Vol. 50 Issue 38, pN.PAG 

    Reports on the charges filed by Synopsis against Magma under the van Ginneken patents to bar Magma Design Automation Inc. from practicing the technologies. Information on the patent assertion letter received by Synopsis from Magma.

  • Court Deals Magma a Blow in Synopsys Litigation. Mutschler, Ann Steffora // Electronic News;12/5/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 49, pN.PAG 

    The article reports on a court case involving design tool providers Synopsys Inc. and Magma Design Automation in December 2005. The Federal District Court for the Northern District of California decided to rule on papers submitted by the parties in the case. Synopsys made a request on the court...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics