TITLE

JUSTICE JACKSON'S DRAFT OPINIONS IN THE STEEL SEIZURE CASES

AUTHOR(S)
White, Adam J.
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2006, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p1107
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article explores the opinion of Justice Robert H. Jackson in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. versus Sawyer. The opinion of Jackson on the case has grown special in legal discourse in relation to the debate over the limits of the Constitution on executive action in the global war on terrorism. The tripartite framework used by Jackson for evaluating executive action is also discussed.
ACCESSION #
22688283

 

Related Articles

  • YOUNGSTOWN GOES TO WAR. Paulsen, Michael Stokes // Constitutional Commentary;Spring2002, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p215 

    Evaluates the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer on June 2, 1952. Analysis on the constitutional crisis significant to the case; Discussion on the executive powers authority of the U.S.; Arguments on the constitutionality of court decision on...

  • THE STEEL SEIZURE CASE AND INHERENT PRESIDENTIAL POWER. Adler, David Gray // Constitutional Commentary;Spring2002, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p155 

    Focuses on a debate on the nature and scope of the executive authority of the U.S. president in U.S. foreign affairs. Evaluation of the decision imposed on the supreme court case Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. versus Sawyer; Discussion of the provisions on executive powers in Article II, section I...

  • The Sound of Congressional Silence: Judicial Distortion of the Legislative-Executive Balance of Power. Baker, Matthew // Brigham Young University Law Review;2009, Vol. 2009 Issue 1, p225 

    This article examines the judicial distortion of the legislative-executive balance of power in the U.S. It clarifies the debate surrounding the meaning of congressional silence and offers a framework to reconcile formalistic and functionalistic concerns. It discusses the doctrine of...

  • That Is What We Said, but This Is What We Meant: Putting the Meaning Back into Use-of-Force Legislation. George, Daniel // George Washington Law Review;Jun2010, Vol. 78 Issue 4, p942 

    The article focuses on a debate about the separation of powers among various branches of the U.S. government, with reference to Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer wherein the Supreme Court set forth the framework by which the constitutionality of presidential action is to be measured. It...

  • A CTUALLY WE SHOULD WAIT : EVALUATING THE OBAMA ADMIN ISTRATION'S COMMITMENT TO UNILATERAL EXECUTIVE-BRANCH ACTION. Marshall, William P. // Utah Law Review;2014, Vol. 2014 Issue 4, p773 

    The article focuses on the commitment of the U.S President Barack Obama's administration to the unilateral executive-branch actions. Topics discussed include the expansion of the presidential power, the opinions of the federal courts and the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S Department of...

  • THE INTERNATIONAL ZONE OF TWILIGHT: ENFORCING CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW BY EXECUTIVE ORDER. WINKLER, ANDREW T. // Wisconsin International Law Journal;2013, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p854 

    The article explores the status of customary international law in the domestic legal system of the U.S. Topics discussed include role of the president as sole organ of the country in the field of international relations, domestic compliance with international obligations as foreign policy, and...

  • The Sounds of Silence: The Irrelevance of Congressional Inaction in Separation of Powers Litigation. Morrison, Alan B. // George Washington Law Review Arguendo;Jul2013, Vol. 81 Issue 4, p1211 

    In a number of significant separation of powers decisions, Supreme Court Justices have relied on Congressional silence to support their conclusion that the President had or did not have the power being challenged. Using language such as "implied" grants or denials of authority and "congressional...

  • The Fourth Zone of Presidential Power: Analyzing the Debt-Ceiling Standoffs Through the Prism of Youngstown Steel. DEVEAUX, CHAD // Connecticut Law Review;Dec2014, Vol. 47 Issue 2, p395 

    In this Article, I use the Youngstown Steel Seizure Case to assess the reoccurring debt-ceiling standoffs between Congress and the White House. If the Treasury reaches the debt limit and Congress fails to act, the president will be forced to choose between three options: (1) cancel programs, (2)...

  • Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court (1930-1999);1999, pN.PAG 

    Presents the case Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics