TITLE

MINNESOTA REPUBLICAN PARTY V. WHITE AND THE FUTURE OF STATE JUDICIAL SELECTION

AUTHOR(S)
Schultz, David
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2006, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p985
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Minnesota Republican Party versus White in relation to state judicial selection. The options that states have to promote judicial independence are explored. The article also examines the politics of judicial selection as well as the different types of state judicial selection methods. The reasons for the trends towards the politicization of state judicial campaigns are also explored.
ACCESSION #
22688281

 

Related Articles

  • JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: IS IT PRESERVED OR IMPAIRED BY THE ELECTION OF JUDGES? Beauchamp Ciparick, Carmen // Albany Law Review;2014, Vol. 77 Issue 4, p1313 

    The article presents a speech by Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, the former Judge of the New York State Court of Appeals delivered at the eighth annual Chief Judge Lawrence H. Cooke spring State Constitutional Commentary symposium held on November 20, 2014. Topics discussed include judicial...

  • Judge on the Stump. Wohl, Alexander // American Prospect;8/12/2002, Vol. 13 Issue 14, p15 

    Considers the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the decision of the state of Minnesota to adopt judicial regulation prohibiting candidate judges from announcing their views on legal or political issues in the case Republican Party of Minnesota v. White. Implication of the ruling for...

  • Religiously Devout Judges: A Decision-Making Framework for Judicial Disqualification. JONES, MICHELLE L. // Indiana Law Journal;Summer2013, Vol. 88 Issue 3, p1089 

    The article analyzes the history of judicial disqualification and discusses the early Roman law as well as the current federal disqualification law. It reflects on possible meanings of judicial impartiality and highlights the U.S. Supreme Court Justice Scalia's decision in Republican Party of...

  • APPEARANCE OF IMPARTIALITY IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY v. WHITE COURT'S OPINION. De los Reyes, Gastón // Boston University Law Review;Apr2003, Vol. 83 Issue 2, p465 

    Analyzes the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in case of the Republican Party of Minnesota versus White. Doctrinal schema of the court's opinion; Content and purpose in instrumental interests; Legal definitions of impartiality.

  • ERODING THE PUBLIC'S CONFIDENCE IN JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY: FIRST AMENDMENT FEDERAL JURISPRUDENCE AND SPECIAL INTEREST FINANCING OF JUDICIAL CAMPAIGNS. De Muniz, Paul J. // Albany Law Review;2004, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p763 

    Examines the case Republican Party of Minnesota v. White to make observations about the future of judicial elections. Threat to judicial impartiality arising from the out-of-control special interest financing of judicial elections; Details of the case; Influence of campaign contributions made...

  • Zero-Sum Judicial Elections: Balancing Free Speech and Impartiality Through Recusal Reform.  // Brigham Young University Law Review;2009, Vol. 2009 Issue 2, p481 

    This article offers suggestions for recusal reform that will appropriately balance U.S. judicial candidates' free speech rights against the need for an impartial judiciary. It summarizes the history of judicial elections and outlines the arguments for and against restricting judicial election...

  • It's Not Who Hires You but Who Can Fire You: The Case Against Retention Elections. AULET, KENNETH J. // Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems;Summer2011, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p589 

    Since Republican Party of Minnesota v. White was decided by the Supreme Court, "merit selection" plans have been the favored method for judicial election reform over non-partisan elections. This Note will offer a survey of the reform methods and examine their flaws -- specifically, the...

  • Does the First Amendment Render Nonpartisan Elections Meaningless? The Sixth Circuit's Carey v. Wolnitzek Decision. Huwitz, Mark S. // Justice System Journal;2011, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p360 

    The article focuses on the U.S. court case Carey v. Wolnitzek, which dealt with the judicial election system in the U.S. Topics include the restriction of judicial campaign funding, the nonpartisan judicial election process in Kentucky, and threshold requirements for appellate review of judicial...

  • "New-Style" Judicial Campaigns and the Legitimacy of State High Courts. Gibson, James L. // Journal of Politics;Oct2009, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p1285 

    Judicial elections in the American states became considerably more complicated with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v White. That ruling extended free speech rights to candidates for judicial office, allowing them the freedom to announce their views on a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics