TITLE

Treatment Disparities in Hispanic Rectal Cancer Patients: A SEER Database Study

AUTHOR(S)
Martinez, Steve R.; Chen, Steven L.; Bilchik, Anton J.
PUB. DATE
October 2006
SOURCE
American Surgeon;Oct2006, Vol. 72 Issue 10, p906
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Although Hispanics demonstrate a low overall incidence of rectal cancer, mortality rates have not decreased relative to non-Hispanic whites. To determine if this was in part due to racial disparities in care, we compared rates of neoadjuvant therapy and sphincter-preserving surgery between Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites diagnosed with rectal cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The study population was comprised of 2,573 Hispanics (55.4% male) and 28,395 non-Hispanic whites (56.6% male). Rates of neoadjuvant radiation were 13.5 per cent for Hispanics compared with 10.4 per cent for non-Hispanic whites (P < 0.001). In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for nodal status, tumor size, and T stage, non-Hispanic whites were significantly less likely to have received neoadjuvant therapy (hazard ratio, 0.72; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.83). Rates of sphincter preservation were 67 per cent for Hispanics and 70 per cent for non-Hispanic whites (P = 0.003). Non-Hispanic whites were significantly more likely to have received a sphincter-preserving operation than Hispanics (hazard ratio, 1.076; P = 0.019; 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.27). We conclude that Hispanics are significantly more likely to receive neoadjuvant therapy but are less likely to receive sphinctersparing operations for rectal cancer compared with non-Hispanic whites. Further studies are required to assess the impact of these treatment disparities on patient outcome.
ACCESSION #
22667472

 

Related Articles

  • Multiple primary tumors following stage II and III rectal cancer in patients receiving radiotherapy, 1998-2010. Smith-Gagen, Julie; Goodwin, George; Tay, Jonathan // Journal of Cancer Research & Clinical Oncology;Jun2014, Vol. 140 Issue 6, p949 

    Objective: This report investigated the impact of radiation therapy among stage II/III rectal cancer patients who were resected for cure and then developed second primary cancer. Methods: The analysis included patients diagnosed with rectal cancer from 1992 to 2010 and who were registered in the...

  • Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: long-term outcome. Dulucq, J.-L.; Wintringer, P.; Stabilini, C.; Mahajna, A. // Surgical Endoscopy;Nov2005, Vol. 19 Issue 11, p1468 

    Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the surgical gold standard treatment for middle and low third rectal carcinoma. Laparoscopy has gradually become accepted for the treatment of colorectal malignancy after a long period of questions regarding its safety. The purposes of...

  • Precision excision of pulmonary metastases - a useful technique. Waldron, D. J.; Darcy, T.; Duignan, J. // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;Feb1989, Vol. 82 Issue 2, p115 

    The article presents a medical case report that deals with precision excision of metastases that allows for removal of multiple metastases without loss of extensive pulmonary volume. The case was of a 60-year-old woman who was treated by anterior resection for a Dukes B moderately differentiated...

  • Surgery for recurrent rectal cancer: technical notes and management of complications. Mirnezami, A. H.; Sagar, P. M. // Techniques in Coloproctology;Sep2010, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p209 

    Local recurrence following surgery for rectal cancer remains a significant clinical problem and poses major therapeutic challenges. Radical surgical salvage is the only option with potential for curative treatment and is indicated in carefully selected patients. Surgery also provides acceptable...

  • Contemporary Indications for and Early Outcomes of Abdominoperineal Resection. Murrell, Zuri A.; Dixon, Matthew R.; Vargas, Hernan; Arnell, Tracey D.; Kumar, Ravin; Stamos, Michael J. // American Surgeon;Oct2005, Vol. 71 Issue 10, p837 

    The purpose of this study was to review and characterize the indications and early outcomes of abdominoperineal resection (APR) when used in a colorectal practice in an academic setting. Data was collected from the charts of all patients undergoing APR in a retrospective manner. Data collected...

  • Robotik abdominal cerrahi: Tek merkezden ilk deneyimler ve sonuçları. Alış, Halil; Gönenç, Murat; Deniztaş, Cemal; Kapan, Selin; Turhan, Ahmet Nuray; Aygün, Erşan // Turkish Journal of Surgery / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi;2011, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p90 

    Purpose: After the technical and ergonomic disadvantages of videoendoscopic surgery had been clearly defined, robotic surgery has emerged as an alternative within the course of searching for the ideal treatment option. Patients and Methods: Medical data of the patients who have been treated by...

  • CHIRURGIA LAPAROSCOPICÄ‚ VERSUS CHIRURGIA DESCHISÄ‚ ÃŽN TRATAMENTUL CANCERULUI DE RECT: REZULTATE PE TERMEN SCURT. FETTI, ALIN-CORNEL; ZAHARIE, FLORIN VASILE; FETTI, EMILIA; POP, CEZAR EMIL; IANCU, CORNEL // Clujul Medical;Dec2012, Vol. 85 Issue 4, p607 

    The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Materials and methods. This prospective clinical study, carried out between 2008-2011, included 260 patients with rectal cancer, of which 60 were treated by...

  • Intentionally curative treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review. Tanis, Pieter J.; Doeksen, Annemiek; van Lanschot, J. Jan B. // Canadian Journal of Surgery;Apr2013, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p135 

    Background: There is a lack of outcome data beyond local recurrence rates after primary treatment in rectal cancer, despite more information being necessary for clinical decision-making. We sought to determine patient selection, therapeutic modalities and outcomes of locally recurrent rectal...

  • Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Morino, M.; Allaix, M. E.; Giraudo, G.; Corno, F.; Garrone, C. // Surgical Endoscopy;Nov2005, Vol. 19 Issue 11, p1460 

    Background: The role of laparoscopic resection (LR) in the management of extraperitoneal rectal cancer still is unclear. This study aimed to compare perioperative and long-term results of laparoscopic and open resection (OR) for low and midrectal cancer.Methods: A...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics