Wavefront Analyzers Induce Instrument Myopia

Cervino, Alejandro; Hosking, Sarah L.; Rai, Gurjeet K.; Naroo, Shezhad A.; Gilmartin, Bernard
October 2006
Journal of Refractive Surgery;Oct2006, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p795
Academic Journal
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of three wavefront analyzers versus a validated binocular open-view autorefractor in determining refractive error in non-cycloplegic eyes. METHODS: Eighty eyes were examined using the SRW-5000 open-view infrared autorefractor and, in randomized sequence, three wavefront analyzers: 1) OPD-Scan (NIDEK, Gamagori, Japan), 2) WASCA (Zeiss/Meditec, Jena, Germany), and 3) Allegretto (WaveLight Laser Technologies AG, Erlangen, Germany). Subjects were healthy adults (19 men and 21 women; mean age: 20.8±2.5 years). Refractive errors ranged from +1.5 to -9.75 diopters (D) (mean: +1.83±2.74 D) with up to 1.75 D cylinder (mean: 0.58±0.53 D). Three readings were collected per instrument by one examiner without anticholinergic agents. Refraction values were decomposed into vector components for analysis, resulting in mean spherical equivalent refraction (M) and J0 and J45 being vectors of cylindrical power at 0° and 45°, respectively. RESULTS: Positive correlation was observed between wavefront analyzers and the SRW-5000 for spherical equivalent refraction (OPD-Scan, r=0.959, P<.001; WASCA, r=0.981, P<.001; Allegretto, r=0.942, P<.001). Mean differences and limits of agreement showed more negative spherical equivalent refraction with wavefront analyzers (OPD-Scan, 0.406±0.768 D [range: 0.235 to 0.580 D] [P<.001]; WASCA, 0.511±0.550 D [range: 0.390 to 0.634 D] [P<.001]; and Allegretto, 0.434±0.904 D [range: 0.233 to 0.635 D] [P<.001]). A second analysis eliminating outliers showed the same trend but lower differences: OPD-Scan (n=75), 0.24±0.41 D (range: 0.15 to 0.34 D) (P<.001); WASCA (n=78), 0.46±0.47 D (range: 0.36 to 0.57 D) (P<.001); and Allegretto (n=77), 0.30±0.62 D (range: 0.16 to 0.44 D) (P<.001). No statistically significant differences were noted for J0 and J45. CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront analyzer refraction resulted in 0.30 D more myopia compared to SRW-5000 refraction in eyes without cycloplegia. This is the result of the accommodation excess attributable to instrument myopia. For the relatively low degrees of astigmatism in this study (<2.0 D), good agreement was noted between wavefront analyzers and the SRW-5000.


Related Articles

  • Wavefront-guided ablations help treat mixed astigmatism. Charters, Lynda; Maloney, Robert // Ophthalmology Times;9/1/2004, Vol. 29 Issue 17, p41 

    Focuses on the preliminary results of wavefront-guided ablations for the treatment of mixed astigmatism or high myopia using the CustomVue system considering the challenge in treating the eyes with difficult refractions. Mean operative sphere and average level of astigmatism; Percentage rate of...

  • shortsightedness.  // Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary (2009);2009, Issue 21, p2120 

    An encyclopedia entry for "shortsightedness," which also refers to myopia, is presented.

  • Genome-wide meta-analyses of multiancestry cohorts identify multiple new susceptibility loci for refractive error and myopia. Verhoeven, Virginie J M; Hysi, Pirro G; Wojciechowski, Robert; Fan, Qiao; Guggenheim, Jeremy A; Höhn, René; MacGregor, Stuart; Hewitt, Alex W; Nag, Abhishek; Cheng, Ching-Yu; Yonova-Doing, Ekaterina; Zhou, Xin; Ikram, M Kamran; Buitendijk, Gabriëlle H S; McMahon, George; Kemp, John P; Pourcain, Beate St; Simpson, Claire L; Mäkelä, Kari-Matti; Lehtimäki, Terho // Nature Genetics;Jun2013, Vol. 45 Issue 6, p712 

    A correction to the article "Genome-wide meta-analyses of multiancestry cohorts identify multiple new susceptibility loci for refractive error and myopia," that appeared in the February 10, 2013 issue is presented.

  • A far-sighted view of myopia. Wildsoet, Christine F.; Wong, Rachel O.L. // Nature Medicine;Aug99, Vol. 5 Issue 8, p879 

    Retinal neurons can differentiate between different types of defocus to mediate changes in ocular growth.

  • Approaching Myopia Holistically: A Case Study and Theoretical Exploration. Bambridge, Anna // Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine;Jun2002, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p371 

    Introduction: Myopia is a commonly occurring condition that, in Western countries, affects 30%-35% of the population. At present the most common way of treating myopia is by optical intervention by means of spectacles, contact lenses, or surgery. Background: An exploration of the history of and...

  • Response to Mahroo et al. Dharani, R; Lee, C-F; Finkelstein, E A; Saw, S-M // Eye;Aug2013, Vol. 27 Issue 8, p991 

    A response from the author of the article "Comparison of measurements of time outdoors and light levels as risk factors for myopia in young Singapore children" in the 2012 issue is presented.

  • Potential effect of 'cut-off intensity' on correlation between light meter measurements and time outdoors. Mahroo, O A; Gavin, E A; Williams, K M; De Smit, E; Hammond, C J; Morrison, D A // Eye;Aug2013, Vol. 27 Issue 8, p990 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Comparison of measurements of time outdoors and light levels as risk factors for myopia in young Singapore children" by R. Dharani and colleagues in the 2012 issue.

  • MYOPIA EPIDEMIC PUTS ONE BILLION AT RISK.  // Optometry Today;Nov2015, Vol. 55 Issue 20, p12 

    The article reports that Brien Holden Vision Institute researchers have asserted that over a billion people around the world are at risk of going blind by 2050 due to myopia.

  • Flapless all-laser procedure outperforms femto-LASIK for high myopia. Cimberle, Michela // Ocular Surgery News;2/25/2013, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p20 

    The article reports that in a comparative study of ReLEx small-incision lenticule extraction and femto-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of high myopia, the former performed better.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics