TITLE

Corps: Court Rejects Challenge to Dredging Project

PUB. DATE
September 2006
SOURCE
ENR: Engineering News-Record;9/4/2006, Vol. 257 Issue 9, p10
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that a federal appeals court turned down an environmental group's lawsuit that found fault with the Corps of Engineers' environmental analysis for a Columbia River dredging project. A panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Seattle, ruled 2-1 that the Corps has taken the required hard look at environmental and economic factors in analyzing the project's effects.
ACCESSION #
22418066

 

Related Articles

  • When complaining doesn't work: Sometimes legal action is the answer if you can't get satisfaction otherwise.  // Consumer Reports Money Adviser;May2010, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p6 

    The article discusses legal strategies in dealing with companies when complaints and reporting to local organizations, state and U.S. federal agencies have not been successful. These include knowing one's legal position, how to find a lawyer, and knowing which court is best for filing the case....

  • Recent Court Decisions. Weinberger, Alan M.; LeGrand, Lauren E. // Appraisal Journal;Summer2009, Vol. 77 Issue 3, p187 

    The article provides brief accounts on trial courts' decisions on various cases related to appraisal in the U.S. In the condemnation proceedings of the Kansas City v. Chung Hoe Ku, the court ruled in favor of the city. The Appellate Supreme Court of New York ruled that the Hempstead town's...

  • JUDGMENT DAY. Carpay, John // Report / Newsmagazine (National Edition);4/15/2002, Vol. 29 Issue 8, p39 

    Reports on legal actions in Canada. Ruling by the British Columbia Court of Appeal that circumstantial evidence linking John Egresits to a marijuana-growing operation was not enough to convict him; The Ontario Court of Appeal's change of the house arrest sentence of Geoffrey Boston, for sexual...

  • JUDGMENT DAY. Carpay, John // Report / Newsmagazine (BC Edition);4/15/2002, Vol. 29 Issue 8, p39 

    Reports on legal actions in Canada. Ruling by the British Columbia Court of Appeal that circumstantial evidence linking John Egresits to a marijuana-growing operation was not enough to convict him; The Ontario Court of Appeal's change of the house arrest sentence of Geoffrey Boston, for sexual...

  • JUDGMENT DAY. Carpay, John // Report / Newsmagazine (Alberta Edition);4/15/2002, Vol. 29 Issue 8, p39 

    Reports on legal actions in Canada. Ruling by the British Columbia Court of Appeal that circumstantial evidence linking John Egresits to a marijuana-growing operation was not enough to convict him; The Ontario Court of Appeal's change of the house arrest sentence of Geoffrey Boston, for sexual...

  • MOTION FOR STAY OF COURT ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION--APPEALABLE ORDER--ILLINOIS.  // Arbitration Journal;Sep1966, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p187 

    The article focuses on the enforcement of arbitration agreements. Motion for stay of court action pending arbitration held by Appellate Court of Illinois to be in substance an application for an interlocutory injunction based on the affirmative defense of arbitration. Hence, order denying motion...

  • TORT -- PURCHASE AGREEMENT -- CONTRACT OF ADHESION -- CLASS ACTION -- CALIFORNIA.  // Arbitration Journal;Jun87, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p75 

    The article evaluates a court decision on classwide arbitration. In the court case entitled "Izzy v. Mesquite Country Club," the trial court erred in ruling that the purchasers' tort claims were outside the scope of an arbitration clause in the purchase agreement. Moreover, it also ruled that...

  • Neskonlith Indian Band v. Salmon Arm (City).  // Canadian Native Law Reporter;2012, Vol. 4, p218 

    The article discusses the court case Neskonlith Indian Band versus Salmon Arm. The Band appealed the decision of the British Columbia (BC) Supreme Court dismissing its application for a judicial review of a decision by the City of Samon Arm, BC to issue a development permit under the Local...

  • Arbitration Agreement Conflicting with Statutory Arbitration Was Void.  // Dispute Resolution Journal;Apr-Sept96, Vol. 51 Issue 2/3, p144 

    The article reports that the Michigan Court of Appeals has held that an arbitration agreement that did not comply with Michigan's statutory arbitration law was void. McKinlay Transport Inc. had agreed to pay 90% of U.S. Truck Company Inc.'s consolidated book value in exchange for all of U.S....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics