Stolt-Nielsen sees red at indictment

Sinclair, Neil
September 2006
ICIS Chemical Business;9/11/2006, Vol. 1 Issue 34, p8
Trade Publication
This article reports on the indictment of global chemical shipping group Stolt-Nielsen by a federal grand jury in Philadelphia for price fixing in the parcel shipping industry. According to the company, the indictment has the potential to effectively chill self-reporting of unlawful conduct by corporations to government agencies. Stolt-Nielsen plans to file a pro-trial hearing response to the indictment at the District Court of Philadelphia.


Related Articles

  • EC targets tanker firms. Brice, Andy; Gibson, Jane // ICIS Chemical Business;4/16/2007, Vol. 2 Issue 62, p37 

    This article reports that Odfjell, Jo Tankers and Stolt-Nielsen have all received a Statement of Objections from the European Commission, signaling that the Commission is starting administrative procedures into the alleged anti-trust case involving the companies. The Statement of Objections...

  • Stolt-Nielsen Indicted on Price-Fixing Charges. D'Amico, Esther // Chemical Week;9/6/2006, Vol. 168 Issue 30, p7 

    The article focuses on the indictment of Stolt-Nielsen on charges of price fixing and bid rigging, and names former Stolt executives Samuel A. Cooperman and Richard B. Wingfield. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) says that the action results from an ongoing antitrust probe of the parcel...

  • More Pleas and Charges in Hoosier Price-Fixing Case.  // Rock Products;May2006, Vol. 109 Issue 5, p21 

    Reports on the number of plea bargains reached and charges filed in a federal investigation into price fixing in central Indiana. Charges filed against Builder's Concrete & Supply and Gus Nuckols III with conspiring with competitors to fix the price of concrete in the Indianapolis metropolitan...

  • JLM Sues Stolt, Odfjell. D'Amico, Esther // Chemical Week;3/12/2003, Vol. 165 Issue 10, p10 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by JLM Industries against Stolt-Nielsen and Odfjell for price-fixing charges. Details of the alleged price-fixing; Defense of Stolt-Nielsen.

  • DOJ Revokes Stolt-Nielsen's Amnesty. D'Amico, Esther // Chemical Week;3/31/2004, Vol. 166 Issue 11, p10 

    Reports on the revocation of the amnesty given by the U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ) for Stolt-Nielsen's alleged role in a conspiracy to fix prices in the deepsea chemical tanker market between 1998 and 2002. Reaction of Stolt to the decision; Companies being investigated by the DOJ in connection...

  • High court denies shipper's second emergency appeal. Anderson, Mark // Buffalo Law Journal;8/28/2006, Vol. 78 Issue 69, p4 

    The article reports on Supreme Court's denial of an emergency appeal by Stolt-Nielsen SA. The said action on August 21 ends the shipping company's bid to get the Supreme Court to bar temporarily Justice prosecutors from seeking indictments against it. The company said that it will promptly move...

  • Stolt-Nielsen slams US price fixing indictment. Sinclair, Neil // ICIS Chemical Business Americas;9/11/2006, Vol. 270 Issue 9, p10 

    The article reports on the criticism of Stolt-Nielsen against the U.S. Department of Justice over the company's formal indictment for price fixing in the parcel shipping industry. The key reason the Department of Justice withdrew from an amnesty agreement made with the company is discussed. A...

  • Dow Sues Deep-Sea Tanker Firms for Price Fixing. D'Amico, Esther // Chemical Week;11/26/2003, Vol. 165 Issue 43, p8 

    Reports on a lawsuit filed by Dow Chemical and its Union Carbide subsidiary against chemical tanker firms Stolt-Nielsen, Odfjell, Jo Tankers and Tokyo Marine for conspiring to set prices and rig bids between 1998 and 2002. Reaction of Stolt to the suit; Reason of Carbide for filing its own...

  • Court stops DoJ prosecution. Burridge, Elaine // European Chemical News;1/24/2005, Vol. 82 Issue 2131, p16 

    Reports that a U.S. federal court has blocked the U.S. Department of Justice from prosecuting Stolt-Nielsen over the alleged price-fixing of freight rates. Reason behind the move;Ruling of the court; Information on the lawsuit filed by Stolt-Nielsen against the alleged cartel of rival firms.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics