Comparison of Impacts of WRF Dynamic Core, Physics Package, and Initial Conditions on Warm Season Rainfall Forecasts

Gallus, Jr., William A.; Bresch, James F.
September 2006
Monthly Weather Review;Sep2006, Vol. 134 Issue 9, p2632
Academic Journal
A series of simulations for 15 events occurring during August 2002 were performed using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model over a domain encompassing most of the central United States to compare the sensitivity of warm season rainfall forecasts with changes in model physics, dynamics, and initial conditions. Most simulations were run with 8-km grid spacing. The Advanced Research WRF (ARW) and the nonhydrostatic mesoscale model (NMM) dynamic cores were used. One physics package (denoted NCEP) used the Betts–Miller–Janjic convective scheme with the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme and GFDL radiation package; the other package (denoted NCAR) used the Kain–Fritsch convective scheme with the Yonsei University PBL scheme and the Dudhia rapid radiative transfer model radiation. Other physical schemes were the same (e.g., the Noah land surface model, Ferrier et al. microphysics) in all runs. Simulations suggest that the sensitivity of the model to changes in physics is a function of which the dynamic core is used, and the sensitivity to the dynamic core is a function of the physics used. The greatest sensitivity in general is associated with a change in physics packages when the NMM core is used. Sensitivity to a change in physics when the ARW core is used is noticeably less. For light rainfall, the spread in the rainfall forecasts when physics are changed under the ARW core is actually less at most times than when the dynamic core is changed while NCAR physics are used. For light rainfall, the WRF model using NCAR physics is much more sensitive to a change in dynamic core than the WRF model using NCEP physics. For heavier rainfall, the opposite is true with a greater sensitivity occurring when NCEP physics is used. Sensitivity to initial conditions (Eta versus the Rapid Update Cycle with an accompanying small change in grid spacing) is generally less substantial than the sensitivity to changes in dynamic core or physics, except in the first 6–12 h of the forecast when it is comparable. As might be expected for warm season rainfall, the finescale structure of rainfall forecasts is more affected by the physics used than the dynamic core used. Surprisingly, however, the overall areal coverage and rain volume within the domain may be more influenced by the dynamic core choice than the physics used.


Related Articles

  • Corridors of Warm Season Precipitation in the Central United States. Tuttle, John D.; Davis, Chris A. // Monthly Weather Review;Sep2006, Vol. 134 Issue 9, p2297 

    During the warm season in the central United States there often exists a corridor of precipitation where a succession of mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) follow similar paths lasting several days. The total cumulative rainfall within a corridor can be substantial while precipitation at nearby...

  • The Influence of Intraseasonal Variations on Medium- to Extended-Range Weather Forecasts over South America. Jones, Charles; Schemm, Jae-Kyung E. // Monthly Weather Review;Feb2000, Vol. 128 Issue 2, p486 

    Focuses on study which examined the influence of intraseasonal variations on the accuracy of weather forecasts on the South Atlantic Convergence Zone (SACZ). Use of data from the Dynamical Extended Range Forecast; Selection of intraseasonal convective activity over the SACZ; Errors in numerical...

  • Sensitivity of Forecast Rainfall in a Texas Convective System to Soil Moisture and Convective Parameterization. Gallus Jr., William A.; Segal, Moti // Weather & Forecasting;Oct2000, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p509 

    The impact of soil moisture on the forecast of a small-scale convective system, and sensitivity of results to the convective parameterization used, are investigated through Eta Model simulations (run in an operationallike setting) of a convective system occurring on 27 May 1997 in Texas. The...

  • MCS Rainfall Forecast Accuracy as a Function of Large-Scale Forcing. Jankov, Isidora; Gallus Jr., William A. // Weather & Forecasting;Apr2004, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p428 

    The large-scale forcing associated with 20 mesoscale convective system (MCS) events has been evaluated to determine how the magnitude of that forcing influences the rainfall forecasts made with a 10-km grid spacing version of the Eta Model. Different convective parameterizations and...

  • The Impact of Different WRF Model Physical Parameterizations and Their Interactions on Warm Season MCS Rainfall. Jankov, Isidora; Gallus Jr., William A.; Segal, Moti; Shaw, Brent; Koch, Steven E. // Weather & Forecasting;Dec2005, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p1048 

    In recent years, a mixed-physics ensemble approach has been investigated as a method to better predict mesoscale convective system (MCS) rainfall. For both mixed-physics ensemble design and interpretation, knowledge of the general impact of various physical schemes and their interactions on warm...

  • Properties of the Convection Scheme in NCEP's Eta Model that Affect Forecast Sounding Interpretation. Baldwin, Michael E.; Kain, John S.; Kay, Michael P. // Weather & Forecasting;Sep2002, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p1063 

    The impact of parameterized convection on Eta Model forecast soundings is examined. The Betts-MillerJanjić parameterization used in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Eta Model introduces characteristic profiles of temperature and moisture in model soundings. These specified...

  • Short-Range (0–48 h) Numerical Prediction of Convective Occurrence, Mode, and Location. Fowle, Michael A.; Roebber, Paul J. // Weather & Forecasting;Oct2003, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p782 

    A verification of high-resolution (6-km grid spacing) short-range (0–48 h) numerical model forecasts of warm-season convective occurrence, mode, and location was conducted over the Lake Michigan region. All available days from 5 April through 20 September 1999 were evaluated using 0.5°...

  • Selection of initial conditions for ensemble forecasts in a simple perfect model framework. Anderson, Jeffrey L. // Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences;1/1/96, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p22 

    Studies the selection of initial conditions for ensemble weather forecasts using a simple chaotic model, the three-variable Lorenz convective model. Sampling of observations with a known distribution of error from the `climate' of the simple model; Examination of three inexpensive algorithms for...

  • The Relationship between Meteorological Parameters and Daily Summer Rainfall Amount and Coverage in West-Central Florida. Brenner, Ira S. // Weather & Forecasting;Apr2004, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p286 

    Considerable daily variations of summer convective rainfall average areal coverage and rainfall amount were identified in west-central Florida for the period May–September 1997–2000 using a 29-site rainfall network. Pearson correlation coefficients identified the correlations to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics