TITLE

The Future of Canada's Role in Hemispheric Defense

AUTHOR(S)
Stancati, Bernard
PUB. DATE
September 2006
SOURCE
Parameters: U.S. Army War College;Autumn2006, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p103
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on the future role of Canada in the defense and security of the North American continent with reference to the new mutual national security issues after 9/11 attacks. The article offers the history of the U.S.-Canada defense partnership with two key factors that affected Canada's future role in the alliance. Unilateral actions taken by the United States after 9/11 damaged the military relationships between two countries.
ACCESSION #
22332929

 

Related Articles

  • Military Transformation. Spiegel, Jayson // Officer;Mar2002, Vol. 79 Issue 2, p8 

    Editorial. Comments on the transformation of the military following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the U.S. Success of the military campaign in Afghanistan; Changes in the principles of war; Adoption of a national security environment.

  • Rocky Mountain News.  // Hill;12/11/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 144, p38 

    An excerpt from the December 10, 2007 issue of "The Rocky Mountain News" is presented.

  • 5 Ways Life Has Changed Since 9/11.  // Junior Scholastic;9/5/2011, Vol. 114 Issue 1, p8 

    The article presents the impact of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in the U.S. which includes the U.S invading Iraq, heightened security, impact on Muslims.

  • Military Responses and Capabilities in Canada's Domestic Context Post 9/11. Madsen, Chris // Journal of Military & Strategic Studies;Spring2011, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p1 

    The article focuses on the military responses and capabilities of the national security policy in Canada after the September 11, 2011 terror attacks in New York. It notes that Canada's federal government has tightened up financial restrictions on potential fund-raising by identified terrorist...

  • Targeting Terrorism. Bulmer-Thomas, Victor // World Today;Oct2001, Vol. 57 Issue 10, p8 

    Argues that the United States (U.S.)-led military operations against those behind the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks are ineffective to totally end global terrorism. Failure of the U.S. and its citizens to realize that they are as vulnerable to terrorist attacks as other countries; How...

  • Defense Policy.  // National Interest;2001 Special Issue, Issue 65, p82 

    Presents the text of discussions about the impact of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on U.S. defense policy.

  • European Missile Defense--Issues and Options. Sokolsky, Richard D. // JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly;Autumn2001, Issue 29, p46 

    Discusses issues and options of the European missile defense. Significance of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) reaction to the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United State; Difficulties in developing a responsible NATO missile defense policy; President George Bush's missile...

  • The US Military One Year After 9/11. Leibstone, Marvin // Military Technology;Aug2002, Vol. 26 Issue 8, p4 

    Focuses on the military policy of the U.S. Impact of the September 11 terrorist attacks on the country; Deployment of forces to Pakistan and the Philippines; Challenges faced by U.S. diplomacy.

  • Ending an Endless War is Getting Harder to Do. HOLHUT, RANDOLPH T. // Progressive Populist;7/1/2013, Vol. 19 Issue 12, p17 

    The article discusses the inability of the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama to end the war against terrorism that started after the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) was approved after 9/11, in which scholar Glenn Greenwald cited two reasons for the unlikely end of the war.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics