TITLE

The Effect of Group Interactions on Satisfaction Judgments: Satisfaction Escalation

PUB. DATE
July 2006
SOURCE
Marketing Science;Jul/Aug2006, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p301
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This study investigates how people's satisfaction judgments are modified after they interact with other group members. It integrates research on customer satisfaction and social influence to develop hypotheses about how an individual's satisfaction is influenced by discrepancies between her expectations about the satisfaction of other group members and their actual opinions as revealed in group discussion. It also considers how this effect is moderated by the individual's susceptibility to social influence and perceptions of group cohesiveness. Two empirical studies demonstrate significant social influence effects on satisfaction judgments in groups. Study One analyzes group satisfaction data collected over time using a mixed-effects regression. It shows that an individual's perceived discrepancy between others satisfaction judgments and expected group satisfaction has an important influence on her postdiscussion satisfaction judgments. Moreover, individuals discount the prediscussion satisfaction judgments of other group members in favor of perceived satisfaction and its discrepancy with expectations. Group cohesiveness accentuates the perceived discrepancy with expected group satisfaction.Study Two analyzes survey data from dyads drawn from a cross-sectional sample of organizational buyers who purchase from the same supplier. It models the decision maker's satisfaction with a service supplier as a function of end-user satisfaction. It shows that social influence effects exist in purchasing groups within organizations. Both studies demonstrate that individual-level postdiscussion satisfaction judgments tend to become more extreme, a phenomenon we call satisfaction escalation.
ACCESSION #
22304062

 

Related Articles

  • Rater Confidence and Social Influence in Performance Appraisals. Zalesny, Mary D. // Journal of Applied Psychology;Jun90, Vol. 75 Issue 3, p274 

    The influence of rater confidence on combined evaluations was examined when information from multiple sources was available. Confidence was related to evaluation extremity for novice raters when no other rater information was available. Information from multiple raters differentially affected...

  • Homo Duplex vs Homo Multiplex. Manterys, Aleksander // Polish Sociological Review;1997, Issue 118, p167 

    Two seemingly contradictory, yet in fact complementary concepts, offering convenient frameworks for theoretical discussion within the social sciences, are presented. The first of these two concepts is the homo duplex formula according to which the human being is viewed in terms of the biological...

  • are your friends a bad influence?  // Dolly;Jun2004, Issue 404, p125 

    Presents a quiz to find out if friends are a bad influence.

  • From Value to Viagra: The Ecosystem of Influence. Hunt, Steve // Security: Solutions for Enterprise Security Leaders;Jan2007, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p28 

    The author reflects on influencers' role to one's personal life as well as business life. He asserts that influencers are everywhere and they can yield one's confidence and divert their ideas and not on personal grounds and simply goes to the flow of the suggestion. However, the real value of...

  • Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review. van den Bos, Ruud; Jolles, Jolle W.; Homberg, Judith R. // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience;Jun2013, Vol. 7, p1 

    Taking decisions plays a pivotal role in daily life and comprises a complex process of assessing and weighing short-term and long-term costs and benefits of competing actions. Decision-making has been shown to be affected by factors such as sex, age, genotype, and personality. Importantly, also...

  • Experimental comparison of direct, general, and indirect reciprocity. Herne, Kaisa; Lappalainen, Olli; Kestilä-Kekkonen, Elina // Journal of Socio-Economics;Aug2013, Vol. 45, p38 

    Highlights: [•] We report on an experiment comparing three forms of reciprocity. [•] Direct and generalized reciprocity are equally intense. [•] Intentions do not contribute to reciprocity. [•] Social influence does not explain reciprocity.

  • Hope: Explication and Operationalization. Chadwick, Amy // Conference Papers -- National Communication Association;2008, p1 

    Despite the importance of hope and the broad use of hope appeals, hope has been ignored in social influence research. This paper explicates hope as an affective process that involves an evaluation of a future or unknown event as consistent with goals, possible but not certain, important, and out...

  • How Games Influence: The Effects of Digital Role Playing on the Likelihood of on the Events on the Self. Ahn, Dohyun // Conference Papers -- National Communication Association;2008, p1 

    One hundred twenty one participants reported their experiences of playing digital games and the likelihood of future events that would happen to them. Playing games led participants to taking roles that were presented by each game, which influenced participants to estimate their likelihood of...

  • biG BaD WoRLd.  // New Internationalist;Dec2013, Issue 468, p44 

    An editorial cartoon is presented on an individual's influence on society.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics