TITLE

Ruling has ramifications

AUTHOR(S)
Weber, Rick
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Trailer / Body Builders;Aug2006, Vol. 47 Issue 10, p28
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas on the court case General Motors Corp. and Rawson-Koenig Inc. v. Hudiburg Chevrolet Inc., et al. The history of the $4.1 million products-liability lawsuit against RKI Inc. is highlighted. The arguments of both parties are presented. The interpretation of the court on the Chapter 82 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code is discussed.
ACCESSION #
22291820

 

Related Articles

  • Guy Carpenter Examines Silica.  // Claims;Apr2005, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p11 

    Focuses on two studies being conducted by Guy Carpenter & Co. to examine decisions made in silica lawsuits filed in Texas. Aim of the study; Trend in the U.S. legal system highlighted in the ruling of the state's Supreme Court in Gomez versus Humble case; Advantage of consolidation of cases to...

  • Court: Auction not liable for truck defect. Freedman, Eric // Automotive News;5/12/2008, Vol. 82 Issue 6307, p26 

    The article reports that the Texas Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that an auction company cannot be held liable for selling a defective vehicle. The decision prevents the estate of a driver who was killed in a rollover accident from seeking product liability damages from Big H Auto Auction....

  • Ruling has ramifications: Texas court rules for component manufacturers. Weber, Rick // Refrigerated Transporter;Aug2006, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p32 

    The article focuses on the ruling by the Supreme Court of Texas in a $4.1 million products-liability lawsuit against RKI Inc. The court dismissed a major claim against RKI maintaining that the Legislature never intended for innocent manufacturers of non-defective parts to have any duty to...

  • A History of the 1999 Discovery Rules: The Debates & Compromises. Shore, Kenneth E. // Review of Litigation;Winter2001, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p89 

    Focuses on the establishment of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee to aid in drafting the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Debate among the plaintiffs' and defense personal injury bar and the district court judges regarding the rules; Details on the first tentative draft adopted by the Supreme...

  • Verdict for GM, brake maker upheld on appeal. Freedman, Eric // Automotive News;4/19/2004, Vol. 78 Issue 6089, p26 

    The estate of a teenage driver killed in the crash of a 1995 Chevrolet Blazer cannot offer reports of consumer complaints about the brake system as evidence at trial, the Mississippi Court of Appeals has ruled. Before the driver's mother bought the vehicle, there were too few complaints about...

  • Negligent Credentialing Claims Held to be "Health Care Liability Claims" Under the MLIIA. Leatherbury, Tom; Youens, Eileen // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q4, p1 

    The article focuses on the decision of the Texas Supreme Court on the health care liability case Garland Community Hospital versus Rose. Cosmetic surgeon Doctor James Fowler of Garland Community Hospital has been sued by Debi Rose alleging that she suffered scarring and other injuries as a...

  • GM settles class-action lawsuits tied to coolant. Twiddy, David // North Texas Automotive Report;May2008, Vol. 10 Issue 8, p14 

    The article reports on the decision made by General Motors Corp. (GM) in Kansas City, Missouri to settle a series of class-action lawsuits claiming a faulty engine coolant. Under the settlement, the company would reimburse class members between $50 and $800 for repairs linked to an orange...

  • FINAL APPROVAL OF RULES FOR DISMISSALS AND EXPEDITED ACTIONS.  // Texas Bar Journal;Mar2013, Vol. 76 Issue 3, p221 

    The article presents the rules approved by the Supreme Court of Texas regarding dismissal of baseless causes of actions and expedited actions. It describes the Texas rules of civil procedure related to dismissal including motions and grounds, contents of motions, and time for motion and ruling....

  • NAII Amicus Brief Asserts Class Action Plaintiffs Have Meritless Cause, Suffered No Product Loss.  // Insurance Advocate;11/25/2002, Vol. 113 Issue 45, p11 

    Reports on the declaration of the National Association of Independent Insurers on class action plaintiffs in Texas. Employment of the rule on class certification; Need for the Texas Supreme Court to review the law; Certification of class action lawsuits.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics