TITLE

Limits ADA Standards: Court narrows disability limits

PUB. DATE
August 1999
SOURCE
FoodService Director;08/15/99, Vol. 12 Issue 8, p26
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that the United States Supreme Court has ruled that food service operators will not be expected to make workplace accomodations for handicapped employees. Overview of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
ACCESSION #
2213117

 

Related Articles

  • Court extends AIDS bias ban.  // FoodService Director;09/15/98, Vol. 11 Issue 9, p26 

    Reports on the United States Supreme Court's decision to extend the Americans With Disabilities Act to cover AIDS patients seeking employment in the food service industry. Interpretation of the Supreme Court of the bill; Argument raised by employer groups against the ruling.

  • Get free updated guide on disability protections. Kennedy // San Diego Business Journal;08/16/99, Vol. 20 Issue 33, p45 

    Answers questions about disability in the workplace. United States Supreme Court's decision on disability protections; Purchase of a telephone amplifier by a hearing-impaired employee.

  • ADA Rulings Help, But... Verespej, Michael A. // Industry Week/IW;07/05/99, Vol. 248 Issue 13, p56 

    No abstract available.

  • Riverside County, Calif. mulls staff-testing law.  // Nation's Restaurant News;03/08/99, Vol. 33 Issue 10, p20 

    Reports the proposal of restaurant owners mandating the screening of all food service workers for communicable diseases. Details on the proposal; Requirements on foodservice employees; Views on the proposal.

  • EQUAL PAY ENFORCEMENT: Congress seeks wage awareness.  // FoodService Director;09/15/2000, Vol. 13 Issue 9, p22 

    Focuses on the Wage Awareness Protection Act that would provide food service workers with protection against the employer retaliation for discussing income information with others in the United States. Sponsor of the legislation; Aim of the legislation.

  • Supreme Court Decisions Require ADA Revision. Hall, James E.; Hatch, D.Diane // Workforce (10928332);Aug99, Vol. 78 Issue 8, p60 

    Provides information on the United States Supreme Court decision regarding the revision of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Implication of the decision; Background and description of the Act; How to determine if an employee is disabled under ADA; Cases which failed to clarify other...

  • DISPARATE IMPACT AND EQUAL PROTECTION AFTER RICCI V. DESTEFANO. McCormick, Marcia L. // Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society;Summer2012, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p100 

    The article discusses the court case Ricci v. DeStefano, in which the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the content of the norm against race discrimination in employment. In the case, the Court instituted a color-blind standard to define discrimination under Title VII in some circumstances. The...

  • New Supreme Court Decisions Provide Guidance to Courts and Employers About the Availability of Punitive Damages Under Title VII and the Definition of a "Disability" Under the Americans With Disabilities Act. Minh Vu // Venulex Legal Summaries;1999 Q4, p1 

    The article discusses new U.S. Supreme Court decisions in cases filed under the Americans With Disabilities Act. The decisions provide guidance to courts and employers about the availability of punitive damages under Title VII and the definition of a disability under the Act. The cases include...

  • Court Ponders ‘Reasonable Accommodations’ Under ADA. Walsh, Mark // Education Week;12/12/2001, Vol. 21 Issue 15, p25 

    Reports on the U.S. Supreme Court's demand for a clear definition and meaning of the clause of reasonable accommodation under the American with Disabilities Act of 1990. Details of a legal case in which Robert Barnett, an employee with U.S. Airways Inc. sued the company for violating the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics