TITLE

Mesa, Ariz., Voters to Face $261 Million for Utility System CIP

AUTHOR(S)
Watts, Jim
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;8/4/2006, Vol. 358 Issue 32438, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that Mesa, Arizona voters will vote in November 2006 to approve a total of $260.7 million in utility revenue bonds to finance the city-owned utility system's capital improvement program. The bond questions for separate utility functions contained in the ballot are also detailed. If the voters approve the bonds, the first tranche would be sold in spring 2007.
ACCESSION #
21973139

 

Related Articles

  • Municipal Bond Elections.  // Bond Buyer;5/25/2005, Vol. 352 Issue 32140, p14 

    The article presents the table of the U.S. municipal bond elections involving $500,000 or more and dates when voters are scheduled to cast their ballots.

  • Lafayette, La., Council Approves Revised Plan to Sell Telecom Bonds for LUS. DeSue, Tedra // Bond Buyer;3/23/2006, Vol. 355 Issue 32345, p36 

    The article reports that the Lafayette Consolidated Government in Louisiana has approved a revised bond ordinance. This will allow the council to issue $125 million of tax-exempt revenue bonds for the Lafayette Utilities System (LUS) to fund telecommunication services. LUS is a public utility...

  • Houston Officials Looking at $625M Bond Referendum for November. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;8/4/2006, Vol. 358 Issue 32438, p4 

    The article reports that Houston, Texas officials are considering a plan to place a $625 million bond question on the November 2006 ballot. City Council members must approve ballot language by the end of August if the plan is to be included in November. City voters may also have the chance to...

  • ALASKA: Anchorage Pares Bond Ballot. Saskal, Rich // Bond Buyer;2/6/2009, Vol. 367 Issue 33057, p9 

    The article reports on the move of the Anchorage Assembly members to cut more than $14 million from a series of bond proposals that will undergo public consultation in Alaska in April 2009. It mentions that the Assembly approved eight bond propositions worth $140 million and acted to beat the...

  • U.S. Municipal Rating Transitions and Defaults, 1986-2003. Woodell, Colleen; Montrone, William; Brady, Brooks // Municipal Finance Journal;Winter2004, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p49 

    Reprints the article "U.S. Municipal Ratings Transitions and Defaults, 1986-2003," by Colleen Woodell, William Montrone and Brooks Brady, from Standard & Poor's Ratings Services. Defaults on housing projects in 2003; Factors which contribute to governmental and rating stability; Increase in...

  • DOING MORE WITH LESS. DeBoda, Ted // Municipal Sewer & Water;Jun2012, p44 

    The article focuses on the effort of water utilities in the U.S. in finding creative funding mechanism to maintain service levels, relying on State Revolving Fund (SRF) programs. SRF offers significantly lower rates compared to municipal bonds and can cut the lifetime cost of a project by over...

  • No New Debt in Orange County's Reshuffled 5-Year Transport Plan. Saskal, Rich // Bond Buyer;11/30/2005, Vol. 354 Issue 32268, p3 

    The article reports that the board of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) has approved a five-year multimillion dollar plan with no new bonding in California. The strategic plan, which readjusts the OCTA's priorities to reflect the cancellation of a planned light-rail line, will be...

  • S&P Downgrades Philadelphia Gas Works One Notch. D'Ambrosio, Jill // Bond Buyer;4/13/2004, Vol. 348 Issue 31861, p3 

    Focuses on the decline in the ratings of the senior revenue bonds of Philadelphia Gas Works in April 2004. Volume of the company's uninsured bonds; Erosion in liquidity driven by deteriorating collection rates; Background on the nation's largest municipally owned gas utility company; Details of...

  • Controversial Refinancing Method Gains Ground Among Muni Issuers. Walker, Susanne // Bond Buyer;7/10/2003, Vol. 345 Issue 31674, p1 

    Reports on plans of municipal bond issuers of Washington State to employ refinancing methods to raise their gains. Sector in which issuers are more interested to examine type of financing feature; Shortcomings of refinancing deals; Reason why insurance companies dislike these schemes.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics