TITLE

Suddenlink, Sinclair Settle Retransmission-Consent Flap

PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Multichannel News;8/14/2006, Vol. 27 Issue 32, p42
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the settlement of the retransmission-consent dispute between Suddenlink Communications Inc. and Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. The retransmission deal facing Suddenlink costs about $40 million. Sinclair requested $1 fee per month for each of the subscribers of Suddenlink. Suddenlink filed a petition to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to compel Sinclair to maintain the stations on Suddenlink cable systems.
ACCESSION #
21950542

 

Related Articles

  • Indy Nation:.  // CableFAX Daily;7/31/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 146, p2 

    Provides information on the rebranded Independent Show to be held in Chicago, Illinois. Proposal by Sinclair that Suddenlink pay a one-time upfront fee plus per-sub charge; Combination by the National Cable Television Cooperative and of the American Cable Association their events at the show;...

  • FCC Sits Out Sinclair Flap. Hearn, Ted; Moss, Linda // Multichannel News;2/5/2007, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p8 

    The article reports that Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will not impose binding arbitration on the dispute between Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. and Mediacom Communications Corp. in the U.S. Mediacom has asked FCC to order both sides into binding arbitration but FCC chairman Kevin...

  • Broadcast-Station Cap Sought. Hearn, Ted // Multichannel News;10/30/2006, Vol. 27 Issue 43, p51 

    The article reports on the demand for independent media-ownership, filed by cable operator Suddenlink Communications Inc. to the Federal Communications Commission on October 23, 2006 in the U.S. Suddenlink wants the federal regulators to make sure that each of the top four television stations in...

  • Retrans:.  // CableFAX Daily;8/8/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 152, p1 

    The article reports on the finalization of the retransmission deal between Suddenlink and Sinclair. The retransmission deal allows for the continued carriage of multiple Sinclair stations in the cable systems that Suddenlink purchased from Charter. Originally, Sinclair requested a $40 million...

  • In the States:.  // CableFAX Daily;8/3/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 149, p2 

    The article presents an update on the cable television industry in the U.S. The board of ION terminated its executive-retention bonus plan as a way to cut costs. Sinclair is hoping to finalize its agreement in principle with Suddenlink for analog and digital carriage of ABC and Fox affiliates in...

  • Suddenlink In Retrans Row. Farrell, Mike // Multichannel News;7/10/2006, Vol. 27 Issue 27, p8 

    Reports on the retransmission-consent conflict between Suddenlink Communications and Sinclair Broadcasting Group after acquiring Charter Communications Inc. Retransmission demanded by Sinclair from Suddenlink; Complaints filed by Suddenlink with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission;...

  • Retrans Warheads to Erupt in '08. Paskowski, Marianne // Television Week;1/22/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p10 

    This article provides an outlook for retransmission consent negotiations between station groups and multiple system operators in the U.S. in 2008. With Sinclair Broadcast Group's yanking of its television stations from Mediacom cable systems, unstable negotiations can be expected. The Federal...

  • Seeking Retransmission Help. FARRELL, MIKE // Multichannel News;11/2/2009, Vol. 30 Issue 41, p14 

    The article reports on the claim against Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. filed by Mediacom Communications Corp., in Federal Communications Commission(FCC), which alleges that the broadcaster is trying to deceive it with higher fees. It also mentions a similar dispute on retransmission consent...

  • Must-carry backlog surpasses 200. Stern, Christopher // Broadcasting & Cable;12/12/94, Vol. 124 Issue 50, p83 

    Reports that the Federal Communications Commission's Cable Services Bureau has more than 200 pending must-carry complaints. Failure of the FCC to meet the legal deadline set by the 1992 Cable Act; Other complaints in the Cable Services Bureau.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics