Kansas High Court Dismisses School Funding Challenge

Watts, Jim
July 2006
Bond Buyer;7/31/2006, Vol. 357 Issue 32434, p5
Trade Publication
The article reports that the Kansas Supreme Court dismissed an action filed by school districts and upheld an existing system of public education finance. Legislators had complied with court orders to increase public expenditures on schools and to revise the process of allocating those resources to school districts.


Related Articles

  • Legal Battles Continue as Arkansas Districts Merge. Richard, Alan // Education Week;7/14/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 42, p25 

    Arkansas' decade-long court battle over school finances may finally be over, but the larger legal and political dogfight over money for rural schools and the consolidation of rural school districts is just beginning to get fierce. Supporters of small rural districts have filed lawsuits in recent...

  • Courts Back Finance Systems in Okla., Fla. Mirga, Tom // Education Week;12/9/1987, Vol. 7 Issue 14, p11 

    The article reports on the ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court and a Florida trial court on a lawsuit filed against those states' school-finance systems. The courts have rejected the lawsuits alleging that those states' school-finance systems violate the rights of children residing in areas...

  • Colo. Supreme Court Rules Against School Vouchers.  // Church & State;Jul/Aug2004, Vol. 57 Issue 7, p3 

    Focuses on the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court against a school voucher program. Violation of school voucher on a section of the state constitution; Facts of the case; Basis of the court decision.

  • California School-Finance Lawsuit Returns to Court. Rudy, Robert // Education Week;2/9/1983, Vol. 2 Issue 20, p1 

    The article reports on the lawsuit concerning the educational finance in California. The author recalls the case involving John Serrano Jr. The California Supreme Court ruled out in 1974 that the state's system of paying for public education, based primarily on property taxes, was...

  • The South Carolina State Supreme Court has upheld a jury's award of $Z25,000 to a school district that sued a former asbestos manufacturer for negligence.  // Education Week;10/3/1990, Vol. 10 Issue 5, p2 

    The article reports that the South Carolina State Supreme Court has upheld a jury's award of 225,000 to a school district that sued Edward Westbrook, a lawyer for the Kershaw Country school district. The court upheld a post-trial review of an asbestos-negligence claim. The decision will serve as...

  • Clerk's Summary of Key Provisions In N.J. `s High Court Ruling in Abbott.  // Education Week;6/13/1990, Vol. 9 Issue 38, p19 

    The article presents a summary of the key provisions of the state Supreme Court's decision on case Abbott v. Burke in New Jersey. The court ordered the state to address the problems faced by students in the states poorest urban districts. It provided that the educational quality in poorest...

  • Austria. Rumersdorfer, Birgit // European State Aid Law Quarterly;Mar2009, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p7 

    The article presents various court decisions from the supreme courts in Austria. It notes the privatization of the provincial bank, Bank Burgenland. It also highlights the disposal of animal by-products occurring in the province of Carinthia. The lawsuit of the Austrian newspaper was also taken...

  • CITY OF PHOENIX V. FIELDS AND BACKUS V. STATE: UNDOING DEER VALLEY'S DAMAGE. Barwell, John F. // Arizona Law Review;Summer2009, Vol. 51 Issue 2, p503 

    The article discusses the court case Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Houser in Arizona. The state Supreme Court held that claims against the state should contain a specific amount for which the claim can be settled. The author argues that this ruling marked an end to the...

  • Purchase and Sale of Silver.  // Accountancy;Apr69, Vol. 80 Issue 908, p280 

    This article discusses a case about the purchase and sale of silver, Chamberlain versus Wisdom at the Court of Appeal in Great Britain in 1968. It was a significant feature of the case that it was not intended that the taxpayer should realize his assets, his house, his government securities, his...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics