TITLE

Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated?

AUTHOR(S)
Brenner, H.; Chang-Claude, J.; Seiler, C. M.; Stürmer, T.; Hoffmeister, M.
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Gut;Aug2006, Vol. 55 Issue 8, p1145
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background and aims: Screening colonoscopy is thought to be a powerful and cost-effective tool to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Whether and when colonoscopy with negative findings has to be repeated is not well defined. The aim of this study was to assess the long term risk of clinically manifest colorectal cancer among subjects with negative findings at colonoscopy. Patients: 380 cases and 485 controls participating in a population based case-control study in Germany. Methods: Detailed history and results of previous colonoscopies were obtained by interview and from medical records. Adjusted relative risks of colorectal cancer among subjects with a previous negative colonoscopy compared with those without previous colonoscopy were estimated according to time since colonoscopy. Results: Subjects with previous negative colonoscopy had a 74% lower risk of colorectal cancer than those without previous colonoscopy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.40)). This low risk was seen even if the colonoscopy had been done up to 20 or more years previously. Particularly low risks were seen for sigma cancer (aOR=0.13 (0.04 to 0.43)) and for rectal cancer (aOR = 0.19 (0.09 to 0.39)), and after a negative screening colonoscopy at ages 55 to 64 (aOR = 0.17 (0.08 to 0.39)) and older (aOR=0.21 (0.10 to 0.41)). Conclusions: Subjects with negative findings at colonoscopy are at very low risk of colorectal cancer and might not need to undergo repeat colonoscopy for 20 years or more, if at all. The possibility of extending screening intervals to 20 years or more might reduce complications and increase the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy based screening programmes.
ACCESSION #
21843686

 

Related Articles

  • Advanced Colorectal Adenomas in Patients Under 45 Years of Age Are Mostly Sporadic. Kushnir, Vladimir; ILKe Nalbantoglu; Watson, Rao; Goodwin, Jonathan; Safar, Elyas; Chokshi, Reena; Azar, Riad; Davidson, Nicholas // Digestive Diseases & Sciences;Nov2014, Vol. 59 Issue 11, p2757 

    Background: The presence of advanced adenomas in younger individuals is a criterion for Lynch syndrome (LS). However, the utility of screening advanced adenomas for loss of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression to identify suspected LS remains unclear. Aims: Determine the prevalence of MMR...

  • Risk factors for colorectal neoplasms based on colonoscopy and pathological diagnoses of Chinese citizens: a multicenter, case-control study. Qin, Miao; Ma, Lan-Qing; Tan, Juan; Chen, Ya-Rong; Zhu, Liang-Ru; Lin, Rong; Hu, Wei-Ling; Li, Jing-Nan; Zhang, Kun-He; Wang, Yan; Li, Jian-Sheng; Xiao, Bing; Chen, Hao-Yan; Chen, Ying-Xuan; Fang, Jing-Yuan // International Journal of Colorectal Disease;Mar2015, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p353 

    Purpose: Since observational data in the urban residents are required to better assess the risk factors of colorectal neoplasm occurrence and the effectiveness of colonoscopy screening and surveillance, we conducted a case-control study at multicenters in China to identify patient...

  • Continuing Medical Education Questions: July 2011. DeVault, Kenneth R.; Carey, Emily; Hanouneh, Ibrahim; Kane, Saul; Navaneethan, Udayakumar // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Jul2011, Vol. 106 Issue 7, p1207 

    A quiz concerning colonoscopy of elderly patients with colorectal cancer is presented.

  • Lead time bias in estimating survival outcomes. Facciorusso, Antonio; Ferrusquía, Jose; Muscatiello, Nicola // Gut;Mar2016, Vol. 65 Issue 3, p538 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Population-Based Assessment of the Outcomes in Patients With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancers," by A. Govindarajan et al. in the March 6, 2015 online issue.

  • THE TRUTH ABOUT colon cancer.  // Massage Magazine;Dec2007, Issue 139, p100 

    The article provides information on the common myths and misconceptions regarding colorectal cancer presented by experts from the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center. It affects both men and women in all races. According to medical records, 50% of people diagnosed with it have no...

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in the Elderly Patient. Day, Lukejohn W.; Walter, Louise C.; Velayos, Fernando // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Jul2011, Vol. 106 Issue 7, p1197 

    Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Older age is associated with a rise in colorectal cancer and adenomas, necessitating the need for CRC screening in older patients. However, decisions about CRC screening and surveillance in older...

  • Colonic Neoplasms in Asymptomatic First-Degree Relatives of Colon Cancer Patients. Guillem, Jose G.; Neugut, Alfred I.; Forde, Kenneth A.; Waye, Jerome D.; Treat, Michael R. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Mar1988, Vol. 83 Issue 3, p271 

    First-degree relatives of colon cancer patients are at elevated risk for developing colorectal neoplasms. In order to assess the potential usefulness of screening by colonoscopy in this high-risk population, we reviewed the records of 48 colonoscopies performed on asymptomatic patients who were...

  • User's perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing quality colonoscopy services in Canada: a study protocol. Jobin, Gilles; Gagnon, Marie Pierre; Candas, Bernard; Dube, Catherine; Abdeljelil, Anis Ben; Grenier, Sonya // Implementation Science;2010, Vol. 5, p85 

    Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a serious and growing health problem in Canada. Colonoscopy is used for screening and diagnosis of symptomatic or high CRC risk individuals. Although a number of countries are now implementing quality colonoscopy services, knowledge synthesis of...

  • Patients at risk of familial colorectal cancer. Knaebel, Hanns-Peter // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);11/5/2005, Vol. 331 Issue 7524, p1033 

    This editorial comments on the controversy over colonoscopic surveillance in individuals at risk of colorectal cancer. Information about the Amsterdam and Bethesda criteria is provided. A study by Dove-Edwin and colleagues focuses on a group of patients who are at risk, but do not meet the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics