TITLE

Ohio High Court Rules Against City's Use of Eminent Domain for Development

AUTHOR(S)
Carvlin, Elizabeth
PUB. DATE
July 2006
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;7/27/2006, Vol. 357 Issue 32432, p36
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the Ohio Supreme Court's ruling that the efforts of Norwood to take property for economic development using eminent domain violated the state constitution. The lawsuit was filed by property owners Carl Gamble and Joy Gamble who refused to sell their property to Norwood. The court commented on the state's treatment of eminent domain.
ACCESSION #
21801118

 

Related Articles

  • Before and after rule not exclusive method of measurement in partial condemnation case.  // Appraisal Journal;Fall2006, Vol. 74 Issue 4, p313 

    The article presents information on the court case State vs. Paul Bunyan Rifle & Sportsman's Club, in which the Court of Appeals of Washington stated that the before and after rule is not the exclusive method for measuring just compensation in a partial condemnation case. About 80 acres of land...

  • Viability comes to fore in site acquisition decisions. Ricketts, Simon // Planning (14672073);9/19/2008, Issue 1787, p11 

    The analyzes the decision of the court over various legal disputes focusing on the validity of the compulsory purchase orders (CPOs) under section 226(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 in Great Britain. It is remarkable that the government refused to accept arguments that the...

  • Court takes up Connecticut eminent-domain dispute. Yost, Pete // Buffalo Law Journal;2/28/2005, Vol. 77 Issue 17, p1 

    Reports on the efforts of the U.S. Supreme Court to balance the rights of property owners in New London, Connecticut against the plan of town officials to sell neighborhoods to private developers. Details of a lawsuit filed by residents of a working-class neighborhood which will be converted...

  • Victory for National City Boxing Gym in Eminent Domain Bout: California Court of Appeals Unanimously Reverses Lower Court.  // La Prensa San Diego;1/23/2009, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p2 

    The article reports on the unanimous decision by the California Court of Appeals to reverse a lower court ruling of eminent domain against a boxing gym in National City, California. It says that the Court's decision sent the case back to the trial court with instructions to allow the Community...

  • STANDING YOUR GROUND. Kurlantzick, Joshua // Entrepreneur;Oct2005, Vol. 33 Issue 10, p30 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court has upheld the rights of cities to use eminent domain, or condemnation, to give land to large businesses to bolster economic development. Difficulty of small landholders to fight eminent domain in state courts; Limitation of the use of eminent domain...

  • Upcoming Ballot Measures Go Beyond Eminent Domain. Saskal, Rich // Bond Buyer;7/28/2006, Vol. 357 Issue 32433, p1 

    The article reports on the United States Supreme Court' decision in "Kelo v. New London, Conn." which upholds the government's ability to seize private property for economic development. The Supreme Court's decision has sparked popular sentiment against such uses of eminent domain. The article...

  • When is Eminent Domain Eminently Unfair? Hudgins, Matt // National Real Estate Investor;May2005, Vol. 47 Issue 5, p14 

    The article reports that the real estate developers counting on city governments to use eminent domain to clear urban renewal sites are watching to see if the U.S. Supreme Court favors property owners in a high-profile eminent domain dispute. The Court is expected to rule in June 2005 in the...

  • Florida Residents File Suit to Halt Eminent Domain-Fueled Development. Sigo, Shelly // Bond Buyer;9/27/2006, Vol. 357 Issue 32475, p32 

    The article reports on the lawsuit filed against The Institute for Justice on behalf of property owners in Riviera Beach, Florida to halt eminent domain-fueled redevelopment projects. Under the redevelopment of the city's waterfront, the lands of residents may be taken over by the city to pursue...

  • That Land Is Your Land, This Land Is My Land…Unitl the Local Government Can Turn It for a Profit: A Critical Analysis of Kelo v. City of New London. Jones, Sonya D. // BYU Journal of Public Law;2005, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p139 

    The article presents an analysis of the Kelo v. City of New London case. The majority in Kelo determined that a public benefit satisfied the public use requirement of the Fifth Amendment. The justice claimed, in her dissent, that the use of public domain is only lawful when private property...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics