Burberry Gets 100K in Trademark Dispute

Jones, Nina
July 2006
WWD: Women's Wear Daily;7/21/2006, Vol. 192 Issue 13, p2
Trade Publication
This article reports on the ruling of a U.S. District Court in Manhattan, New York regarding the trademark infringement case filed by Burberry against Marco Leather. In addition to paying Burberry damages, Marco Leather was ordered to abandon its trademark application and to halt use of all design details deemed to be confusingly similar to Burberry's.


Related Articles

  • Burberry Sues TJX Over Alleged Counterfeits.  // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;3/10/2010, Vol. 199 Issue 51, p14 

    The article presents information on the trademark lawsuit filled by Burberry Ltd. against the TJX Cos. Inc. Burberry has accused TJX of selling counterfeits and infringing products across its several nameplates and the lawsuit was filled on March 3, 2010 in U.S. District Court in Manhattan....

  • Proving Trademark Violation Complicated by Claims Between 'Bitter' Ex-Spouses.  // Business Valuation Update;Dec2009, Vol. 15 Issue 12, p15 

    The article discusses a court case on the rights over the business of bakery equipment supply in the U.S. of the former spouses after they disputed for divorce. The New Jersey federal district court discover the husband's trademark infringement based on his infringing sales from 1997-2007 with...

  • Burberry Files Suit Against Iconix. Casabona, Liza // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;8/29/2007, Vol. 194 Issue 44, p2 

    the article reports that Burberry accused Iconix of infringing on Burberry's signature check design. Burberry alleged that the revamped London Fog trenchcoats and scarves bear a check pattern that are nearly identical to Burberry's own. The lawsuit contained federal- and state-level allegations...

  • industry BRIEFS.  // Industrial Safety & Hygiene News;Jul2008, Vol. 42 Issue 7, p58 

    The article offers new briefs related to industrial safety and hygiene in the U.S. The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) honored its 2008 Awards recipients at the American Industrial Hygience Conference and Exposition. The American Society of Safety Engineers...

  • An Empirical Study of the Multifactor Tests for Trademark Infringement. Beebe, Barton // California Law Review;Dec2006, Vol. 94 Issue 6, p1581 

    The thirteen circuits' thirteen different multifactor tests for the likelihood of consumer confusion have long played a role of central importance in American trademark litigation, yet they have received little academic attention and no empirical analysis. Courts, commentators, and practitioners...

  • Consistency of Confusion? A Fifteen-Year Revisiting of Barton Beebe's Empirical Analysis of Multifactor Tests for Trademark Infringement. Blum, Kevin; Fox, Ariel; Hayes, Christina J.; Xu, James Hanjun // Stanford Technology Law Review;2010, Issue 4, p1 

    The article examines the validity of empirical analysis of multifactor tests for trademark infringement by Professor Barton Beebe, related to confusion among the consumers for similar product packaging, design and labeling. After examining the infringement cases of fifteen-year period in the...

  • ABC Files Trademark Infringement Complaint Against the BOC.  // O&P Business News;8/15/2007, Vol. 16 Issue 16, p18 

    This article focuses on the complaint filed by the American Board for Certification in Orthotics, Prosthetics and Pedorthics Inc. (ABC) in U.S. District Court against the Board for Orthotist/Prosthetist Certification (BOC) for trademark infringement. The pedorthist certification program of BOC...

  • Recent Developments in IP Law. Gatz, John C. // Landslide;Sep/Oct2012, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p58 

    The article discusses developments in intellectual property (IP) law as of September 2012. In the case Erickson v. Blake, the court determined that any similarities between the work of Blake and Erickson's copyright were based on the pattern formed by the digits of the number pi which is not...

  • Quibbling about 'stones'. Moore, Miles // Tire Business;5/10/2010, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p1 

    The article focuses on the trademark infringement lawsuit filed by Bridgestone Corp. and two of its subsidiaries on tire distributor Commerce Max Inc. It mentions that a complaint was filed by Bridgestone and its subsidiaries against Commercial Max, for violating the Bridgestone trademark by...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics