Burning a popular choice

Abram, Mike
June 2006
Farmers Weekly;6/23/2006, Vol. 144 Issue 25, p12
Trade Publication
The article reports on the results of a survey conducted at the Cereal 2006 event regarding the options of farmers for burning their pesticide containers in Great Britain. There are eighty-five percent of farmers who will continue using a drum incinerator for burning the containers until the derogation of the British Environment Agency lapses. Collection scheme is cited by 60% of the respondents as the most popular option when the derogation lapsed.


Related Articles

  • EA grants drum incinerators stay of execution--for now. Abel, Charles // Farmers Weekly;12/17/2004, Vol. 141 Issue 25, p39 

    Reports on an extension given to pesticide users on the use of drum incinerators in burning empty containers on-farm in Great Britain, as of December 2004. Reason behind the extension; Assessment of the use of drum incinerators as an alternative to farm waste disposal conducted by the British...

  • EA asks farmers to store their own water.  // Utility Week;3/8/2013, p9 

    The article reports that the British Environment Agency (EA) has encouraged farmers and businesses to store water in preparation for extreme weather conditions in the country.

  • Untitled. Case, Philip // Farmers Weekly;12/7/2012, Vol. 158 Issue 23, p97 

    The article reports on the warning issued by the Environment Agency that dozens of growers in Great Britain could lose their water abstraction licences if they could not renew them before the end of 2012.

  • Trash to cash. GOSS, JOHN // International Power Generation;Dec98, Vol. 21 Issue 9, p8 

    Reports on incinerator plant. Composition of the plant; Functions of the plant; Requirement of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990 for plant owners regarding their plant regulated by the Environment Agency of Great Britain; Advantages of the waste incineration and CHP approach adopted by...

  • Abstraction measores seek to increase water regulations' flexibility for growers.  // Horticulture Week;3/9/2012, p6 

    The article informs that Great Britain. Environment Agency will be supporting the farming community in filling the irrigation reservoirs during the winter abstraction season.

  • Dual assurance visits could save farms money.  // Poultry World;Jun2010, Vol. 164 Issue 6, p12 

    The article reports that poultry farmers in Great Britain could save at least 500 pounds annually in Environment Agency (EA) fees by getting a farm assurance/assessment from the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) in 2010, based on NSF-Cmi Certification.

  • Bid to ease the growing burden of regulations. Abel, Charles // Farmers Weekly;11/29/2002, Vol. 137 Issue 22, p55 

    Focuses on the NetRegs system of the British Environment Agency for the compliance of British farmers to environmental regulations. Objectives of the program; Percentage of serious pollution incidents that occur on farms; Effect of the system on the farm inspection requirements.

  • Put trust in farmers to solve flooding fiasco. Case, Philip // Farmers Weekly;2/8/2013, Vol. 159 Issue 6, p92 

    The author discusses the need for the British Environment Agency to trust landowners and generate guidelines that make it easier for farmers to carry out their own maintenance. He talks about how the British government was blamed by many farmers for the effects of extensive flooding on farmlands...

  • Limit run-off, maize growers are warned.  // Farmers Weekly;10/8/2010, Vol. 153 Issue 14, p14 

    The article reports that the British Environment Agency is warning maize farmers to limit surface run-off and soil loss caused by heavy machinery because they could pollute waterways and could lead to flooding.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics