Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act

June 2006
Issues in Law & Medicine;Summer2006, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p83
Academic Journal
The article discusses the concepts of the Health-Care Decisions Act which offers uniformity regarding health care decisions and authorizations in the U.S. It explains the six concepts for which the Act was built on as well as the sections included in the Act. It also shows the three other health care Acts which the Health-Care Decisions Act supersedes.


Related Articles

  • Order at the End of Life: Establishing a Clear and Fair Mechanism for the Resolution of Futility Disputes. Bassel, Ashley // Vanderbilt Law Review;Mar2010, Vol. 63 Issue 2, p491 

    The article focuses on the significant aspects of futility disputes. It discusses the establishment of a fair and clear mechanism for the resolution of futility disputes. It cites various medical cases wherein healthcare decision making for incompetent patients was involved. It concludes that...

  • GP commissioning in England. Charlton, Rodger // Clinical Medicine;Feb2013, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p24 

    The NHS, yet again, is in transition with an emphasis on groups of general practitioners (GPs) (clinical commissioning groups) making decisions on which specialist services should be chosen for patients requiring referral from primary care. It is an area of new terminology with a new language...

  • The Semblance of Autonomy: Treatment of Persons with Disabilities Under the Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act. Stith, Marah // Issues in Law & Medicine;Summer2006, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p39 

    This Article illuminates the dangers of the Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act, which provides a set of model rules designed to clarify and expedite end-of-life health-care decisionmaking for incapacitated patients. The uniform commissioners and many scholars who have ...

  • The healthcare decisions we make should be personal. Bibby, Jo // BMJ: British Medical Journal;9/13/2014, Vol. 349 Issue 7974, p39 

    In this article the author calls for a personalised healthcare decision and discusses the challenges facing the personalisation agenda of healthcare including the limited role of the Nationa Health Service (NHS) in looking after the people.

  • Public and patient involvement in individual healthcare rationing. Russell, Jill; Greenhalgh, Trisha; Burnett, Andrew; Montgomery, Jonathan // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;6/25/2011, Vol. 342 Issue 7812, p1399 

    The article discusses the aspects of public and patient involvement in individual healthcare rationing in Great Britain. The English National Health Service (NHS) is having major reconstructuring targeting efficiency improvement. It only not provides guidance on how the patients and the public...

  • When Vitalism is Dead Wrong: The Discrimination Against and Torture of Incompetent Patients by Compulsory Life-Sustaining Treatment. Ouellette, Alicia R. // Indiana Law Journal;Winter2004, Vol. 79 Issue 1, p1 

    Exposes the gaps, which compel health care providers to force life-sustaining treatment in certain medical cases, regardless of the pain or bodily degradation that treatment may cause, in the laws that prohibit surrogates from making treatment decisions for incompetent individuals. Laws that...

  • Best interests of the child: who decides? Starr, Linda // Australian Nursing & Midwifery Journal;Aug2015, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p25 

    The article focuses on the disagreement of the treating practitioner and the parents in the treatment of the child with terminal illness. Topics include the case of a 10 year old girl with liver cancer which the oncologist decided chemotherapy treatment while the parents decided natural therapy...

  • GETTING PHYSICIANS AND PATIENTS TO CHOOSE WISELY: DOES THE LAW HELP OR HURT? Kapp, Marshall B. // University of Toledo Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 46 Issue 3, p529 

    The article discusses evidence-based medicine (EBM) may have negative implications for the quality of patient care. Topics discussed include laws governing medical and health policy establishments; ways to respond physicians' litigation and liability-related apprehensions associated with EBM;...

  • INFORMING A PATIENT THEY HAVE DEMENTIA IS A CLINICAL JUDGEMENT. Owen, Michael // Nursing Standard;6/17/2015, Vol. 29 Issue 42, p33 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article discussing the relevance of informing patients of a diagnosis of dementia.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics