The Securities and Exchange Commission

July 2006
Investment Dealers' Digest;7/17/2006, Vol. 72 Issue 28, p5
Trade Publication
This article reports on the Securities and Exchange Commission in relation to a landmark decision that restricts the use of soft dollars and the kinds of services that money managers can get for sending inflated trading commissions to brokerages. The new rules, which were first drafted in October, take effect in six months.


Related Articles

  • NAIPFA Adopts New Registration Requirement for Investment Advisers. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;10/17/2000, Vol. 334 Issue 30997, p5 

    Reports that the National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors adopted a policy that calls for its members to register as investment advisers with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or with states. Consistency of the policy with a legal bulletin earlier...

  • SEC adding to online rules.  // Pensions & Investments;6/24/1996, Vol. 24 Issue 13, p42 

    Reports on the plans of the US Securities and Exchange Commission to issue an interpretive release on investment advisers offering services and providing documents online.

  • Funds can tout track records that managers made elsewhere. Hensley, Scott // American Banker;8/14/1996, Vol. 161 Issue 155, p1 

    Reports on US Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) ruling which allows fund managers who transfer to other fund companies to take their performance records with them. SEC's approval of fund manager Elizabeth Bramwell's request to use her track record at Gabelli & Co. in the prospectus of...

  • The Shadow Advisers. Koreto, Richard J. // Financial Planning;Jun2002, Vol. 32 Issue 6, p91 

    Reports on Web-based investment advisers in the U.S. Policy of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the advisers; Requirements for an Internet-based adviser; Factors that led to the creation of the Web site advisory services.

  • SEC's G-37-Like Rule for IAs Is Dead. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;01/30/2001, Vol. 335 Issue 31066, p1 

    Reports on the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's proposed G-37-like rule for investment advisers. Voluntary imposition of a moratorium on the rulemaking proposal; Need to protect investors.

  • There is enough evidence to warrant a G-37-like rule, Maco says. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;12/14/99, Vol. 330 Issue 30787, p32 

    Reports on the need for the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's proposed G-37-like rule for investment advisers. Absence of evidence of pay-to-play abuses in the public money management arena.

  • Supreme Court: SEC has jurisdiction over unregistered investment advisers. Ferris, Craig T. // Bond Buyer;03/07/2000, Vol. 331 Issue 30843, p6 

    Focuses on the support of the Supreme Court on the enforcement power of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over unregistered investment advisers in the United States. Contribution of the investment advisers on the higher court action; Investigation on Victor Teicher & Co. as the onset of...

  • SEC may check up on disclaimer, other compliance, Maco says. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;03/07/2000, Vol. 331 Issue 30843, p7 

    Focuses on the legal bulletin issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to provide updates to financial and investment advisers in the United States. Settlement of the enforcement case between SEC and O'Brien Partners; Violation of O'Brien Partners to the Investment Advisers Act...

  • Is the SEC Rethinking Adviser Rule? Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;04/28/2000, Vol. 332 Issue 30880, p1 

    Reports on the possibility that the United States Securities & Exchange Commission is backing away from the idea of a G-37-like rule. Prohibition of investment advisers from engaging in pay-to-play practices to obtain pension and other public money management business.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics