Jensen, Arthur R.
May 1970
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;May1970, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p17
The article presents a reply to the criticisms made by Richard C. Lewontin, a professor of biology at the University of Chicago on Professor Arthur R. Jensen's article "How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?" which was published in the winter, 1969 issue of "Harvard Educational Review." The Jensen theory concluded that individual differences in intelligence are predominantly attributed to genetic differences, with environmental factors playing a minor part. The author agrees with Lewontin's assumption that educational practices and educational psychology are still in the seventeenth century, especially with regards to recognition of group and individual differences.


Related Articles

  • Nature vs. Nurture.  // Education Digest;Sep1969, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p59 

    The article reports on a new storm of controversy over an old topic that has been aroused by University of California psychologist Arthur Jensen. Jensen's contention that intelligence is determined largely by heredity has evoked a flood of published rebuttals as well as innumerable...

  • Further Remarks on Race and the Genetics of Intelligence. Lewontin, Richard C. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;May1970, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p23 

    The article shares the author's thoughts concerning the respond of Arthur R Jensen to his analysis of "How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?" The author notes that his analysis to the article of Jansen did not contain an ad hominem argument. Meanwhile, he said that Jensen has...

  • Educational Relevance and Jensen's Conclusions. Anastasiow, Nicholas // Education Digest;Dec1969, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p34 

    The article presents a discussion related to education in the U.S., while referring to educator Arthur R. Jensen's paper published in the an issue of the journal "Harvard Educational Review." There has been general disagreement about Jensen's two conclusions. First, that genetic factors are...

  • The trouble with intelligence. Freeman, Peter // Bulletin with Newsweek;10/17/2000, Vol. 118 Issue 6246, p52 

    Focuses on differing views on intelligence. Ability measured by the Intelligence Quotient (IQ); Distortion of the true nature of cognitive abilities; Influence of genetic factors on psychological functions; IQ scores of poor children adopted by upper middle-class families in France.

  • The Developmental Etiology of High IQ. Brant, Angela M.; Haberstick, Brett C.; Corley, Robin P.; Wadsworth, Sally J.; DeFries, John C.; Hewitt, John K. // Behavior Genetics;Jul2009, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p393 

    The genetic and environmental trends in IQ development were assessed in 483 same-sex twin pairs in the Colorado longitudinal twin study using maximum-likelihood model-fitting analysis. The twins were assessed periodically from ages 1 to 16. Results show a decreasing influence of shared...

  • Objectivity and Ideology In Educational Research. Selden, Steven // Phi Delta Kappan;Dec84, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p281 

    Reacts to the article by Arthur R. Jensen 'Political Ideologies and Educational Research,' published in the March 1984 issue of 'Phi Delta Kappan.' Case for viewing objectivity and ideology as complementary rather than contradictory aspects of educational research; Myth that science itself is...

  • A Genetic Investigation of the Covariation Among Inspection Time, Choice Reaction Time, and IQ Subtest Scores. Michelle Luciano, Wendy H.; Wright, Margaret J.; Geffen, Gina M.; Geffen, Laurie B.; Smith, Glen A.; Martin, Nicholas G. // Behavior Genetics;Jan2004, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p41 

    Information processing speed, as measured by elementary cognitive tasks, is correlated with higher order cognitive ability so that increased speed relates to improved cognitive performance. The question of whether the genetic variation in Inspection Time (IT) and Choice Reaction Time (CRT) is...

  • Human expression patterns: Genetic differences between populations. O'Hara, R. B. // Heredity;May2007, Vol. 98 Issue 5, p245 

    The author reflects on the microarray studies of genetic differences between populations in the U.S. He said that microarray studies of genetic differences involves strengths and weaknesses such as producing large amount of data and the difficulties of interpreting these data. He added that...

  • Jensen and Flynn. Sowell, Thomas // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;12/3/2012, Vol. 42 Issue 18, p23 

    The author focuses on Professor Arthur R. Jensen of the University of California at Berkeley, author of "Are We Getting Smarter," and Professor James R. Flynn, both leading advocates of opposite conclusions on the subject of the role of genes in intelligence quotient (IQ) scores.


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics