TITLE

Planning Lessons from Afghanistan and Iraq

AUTHOR(S)
Collins, Joseph J.
PUB. DATE
April 2006
SOURCE
JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly;Spring2006, Issue 41, p10
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the security threat and the plans that leaders make for the diplomatic and military power to meet this threat. According to the author, it is necessary to involve the interagency community in the military aspects of the planning process to achieve security objectives. The author also suggests recommendations to improve mid-range planning in the U.S. which include the need of a new charter for complex contingency planning, interagency experience, gain legitimacy and others.
ACCESSION #
21543794

 

Related Articles

  • A Special Operations Model for Forward Support Companies. Bogart, James W. // Army Logistician;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p30 

    The article reports on the on the Special Operations forward support company (FSC) commander’s expanded responsibilities and the organization of the FSC in an operating environment in the U.S. The Special Operations FSC commander as a planner coordinates with conventional logistics units...

  • SOFTACS to Support C4| Requirements of Special Operations Forces. Oquendo, Gregory // Special Warfare: The Professional Bulletin of the John F. Kenned;Apr2005, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p26 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) to approve the development of the Special Operations Forces Tactical Assured Connectivity System (SOFTACS). Increased data capability and interoperability among U.S. special operations forces (SOF) will be...

  • Using the Project Management Body of Knowledge to Enhance the Operations Process. Moore, Kyle P. // Engineer; 

    The article discusses the effectiveness of Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) in enhancing military opertaion process. It notes that it is easy to determine the value and utility of studying and employing project management at the unit level. It outlines the five phases of PMBOK which...

  • Effects-based Operations: A Critique. Milan E.Vego // JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly;Spring2006, Issue 41, p51 

    The article comments on the effect-based operations (EBO) in which, together with the network-centric warfare (NCW), sees war as a business. The approach to warfare depends on mathematical methods for predicting and measuring effects. According to the author, the people behind EBO claim that...

  • Joint Fires Support, the Joint Fires Element and the CGRS: Keys to Success for CJSOTF-West. Green, Robert B. // Special Warfare: The Professional Bulletin of the John F. Kenned;Apr2005, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p12 

    The article describes several keys to the success of the U.S. Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force-West (CJSOTF-W). The mission of this force was to interdict ground-based time-sensitive targets (TST) in the western desert of Iraq to support the combined force air-component commander...

  • Operational Centers of Gravity. Witty, David M. // JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly;Winter2008, Issue 48, p98 

    The article discusses the concept of center of gravity (COG), the central U.S. joint doctrine, and its relevance primarily in attacking Al Qaeda. COG is identified in the three level of war, such as strategic, operational, and tactical. It states that U.S. operational commanders can attack al...

  • Major Joint/Combined Operations. Vego, Milan N. // JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly;Winter2008, Issue 48, p111 

    The article discusses the major joint/combined operations, the initial phase of a campaign in military combat. It provides the history of joint operations in the U.S. as well as its advantages, including the complementary capabilities, greater flexibility, and the several options in the...

  • Off the Shelf: Thoughts on Building Joint-Mindedness. Hanley, Brian J. // JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly;Winter2008, Issue 48, p140 

    The article discusses the concept of center of gravity (COG), the central U.S. joint doctrine, and its relevance primarily in attacking Al Qaeda. COG is identified in the three level of war, such as strategic, operational, and tactical. It states that U.S. operational commanders can attack al...

  • Targeting: A Process for Wizards or Methodology for Patriarchs? Green, Thomas S. // Cavalry & Armor Journal;Jan-Mar2012, Vol. 120 Issue 1, p36 

    The article discusses targeting as essential to planning, coordination and synchronization of military operations. The author explains that targeting is an extension and not separate from military decision-making process (MDMP), and with continuous MDMP, so does targeting in one form or another....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics