TITLE

High Court's Ruling Stirs Debate Over G-37

AUTHOR(S)
Hume, Lynn
PUB. DATE
June 2006
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;6/28/2006, Vol. 356 Issue 32412, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the impact of the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court about strict limits on campaign spending and contributions of Vermont on Rule G-37 of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The rule specifies to prevent dealers from engaging in municipal securities business with an issuer for two years if it contributes to an issuer official. Christopher Taylor of the board claims that the court ruling does not affect the rule in any way.
ACCESSION #
21470291

 

Related Articles

  • Soft-Money Ban Upheld. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;12/11/2003, Vol. 346 Issue 31779, p1 

    Reports on the approval of a law by the Supreme Court banning national parties from raising unregulatory funds and restricting certain campaign finance practice in the U.S. Title of the law; Legislators supported the law; Impact of the law on the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's Rule G-37.

  • High Court's Ruling Shouldn't Affect MSRB Restrictions. Dutton, Audrey; Hume, Lynn // Investment Dealers' Digest;1/22/2010, Vol. 76 Issue 3, p12 

    The article discusses the insignificant impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to authorize corporations to use their funds for a political candidate, towards the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's Rule G-37 in the country.

  • Two Section 1983 cases highlight term's early decisions. Young, Rowland L. // American Bar Association Journal;Feb82, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p199 

    Presents updates on cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, as of the court holiday recess in December 1981. Decisions on cases involving public defenders; Youth Corrections Act; Campaign contributions.

  • Freer money.  // Hill;6/26/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 77, p32 

    The author reflects on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court related to the nation's campaign finance laws. The Court struck down the ban on corporations and labor unions buying television advertisements in the run-up to elections. The author explains that the court's decision will probably mean...

  • A Gift to Millionaires. Wasserman, David // National Journal;7/5/2008, p3 

    The article focuses on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that invalidates the millionaire's amendment, the provision of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act that seeks to level the playing field for House or Senate candidates who face wealthy opponents writing big checks for their own campaigns. It...

  • Freer political speech for corporations. Caplan, Lincoln // Columbia Journalism Review;Jul/Aug1978, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p18 

    This article discusses a ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court which held a Massachusetts statute that prohibited corporations from contributing to campaigns on referenda in which they had no direct financial interests unconstitutional in April 1978. Specifically, five institutions sought to campaign...

  • Big Free Speech Win. Andrusko, Dave // National Right to Life News;Jan2007, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p18 

    The article reports that U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, joined by U.S. Court of Appeals Judge David B. Sentelle, held that the McCain-Feingold's campaign finance reform law is unconstitutional as applied to lobbying advertisements created by Wisconsin Right to Life. The Supreme Court said...

  • New Rules of the Game. Carney, Eliza Newlin; Stone, Peter H.; Barnes, James A. // National Journal;12/20/2003, Vol. 35 Issue 51/52, p3800 

    Comments on the flow of unregulated campaign funds in the U.S. despite the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court to deny a campaign finance law that bans the campaign contributions. Implications of the ruling to the U.S. political system; Criticisms against the law; Action taken by political parties...

  • Jester on MSRB Agenda. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;10/27/2003, Vol. 346 Issue 31748, p1 

    Reports on the delay of the real-time trade reporting in the municipal market of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board in the U.S. Consideration of the price disparities in the market; Modification of political contributions; Inclusions of derivatives and disclosure.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics