TITLE

Aesthetic Concerns Justify Permit Denial

AUTHOR(S)
Lawlor, James
PUB. DATE
July 2006
SOURCE
Planning;Jul2006, Vol. 72 Issue 7, p46
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the ruling of the Court of Appeals that favors the previous decision of the City of Wichita in referring to aesthetic condition against the appeal of R. H. Gump Revocable Trust in April 2006 in Kansas. Gump requested for a permit to install a 135 foot tall wireless communications antenna in the district in 2003 and it was concealed by referring it as a flagpole. The council, upon reviewing the project, have seen the damaging effect it will give to the beautification programs initiated in the area. But Gump contends that the judgment was unfair and stand that aesthetic basis is a clear absurdity. The court, on the other hand, contends that it was a valid consideration and supports the city council's initiative.
ACCESSION #
21401498

 

Related Articles

  • The Defective Premises Act. Brewer, Geoff // Contract Journal;7/16/2003, Vol. 419 Issue 6435, p22 

    Discusses the provisions of the Defective Premises Act of 1972 for the construction industry in Great Britain. Penalties for violators of the act; Examination of the provisions as applied to the Alderson versus Beetham Organization case.

  • FRINGE BENEFITS. Grewal, Herpreet Kaur // Regeneration & Renewal;6/6/2008, p20 

    The article outlines the three development schemes of large development projects beyond the boundaries of section 106 in Great Britain. It gives off a variety of analysis and discussion regarding the primary benefits of the regeneration project and how developers make an effort to move beyond...

  • Mayors aid lobbying to avert dilution of CRA. de Senerpont Domis, Olaf // American Banker;9/8/1995, Vol. 160 Issue 173, p2 

    Reports on a letter signed by 2,100 groups and individuals including 200 mayors that was sent to lawmakers to protest legislation that would dilute the United States Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). Exemption of small banks from the reinvestment law; Banning of community groups from blocking...

  • Unlocking the potential of the C.R.A. Watts, D.M. // Black Enterprise;Jul89, Vol. 19 Issue 12, p21 

    Discusses the United States Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) passed 12 years ago requiring banks and other financial institutions to reinvest in minority communities. Failures of the act to date; Proposed amendments for a strengthened CRA.

  • Statements to the Congress. Lindsey, Lawrence B. // Federal Reserve Bulletin;Nov93, Vol. 79 Issue 11, p1020 

    Discusses the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) of 1977 and the efforts of agencies to strengthen and improve its administration. Imperfections of the CRA; Compliance examinations and improvements; Lending initiatives; Community affairs program; Applications process; Federal reserve system.

  • Statements to the Congress. Lindsey, Lawrence B. // Federal Reserve Bulletin;Dec93, Vol. 79 Issue 12, p1127 

    Presents speech by a Federal Reserve System Board of Governors member, before the Subcommittee on Consumer Credit and Insurance, Finance and Urban Affairs, US House of Representatives, dealing with the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and improvements of its administration. Impact of the CRA;...

  • New CRA proposal.  // Mortgage Banking;Nov94, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p6 

    Reports on federal banking regulators' issuance of proposed guidelines for compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). Replacement of the 12 assessment factors used in CRA examinations; Use of market share as the basis for lending.

  • CRA's more flexible yardstick. Kane, Kevin T. // Mortgage Banking;Sep97, Vol. 57 Issue 12, p54 

    Details the provisions included in the revised United States Community Reinvestment Act of 1997. Definition of large banks; Ability for financial institutions to define themselves based on the products they offer and communities served; Examination procedures for performance-type data for...

  • Questions persist over CRA. Fogarty, Mark // U.S. Banker;Aug96, Vol. 106 Issue 8, p68 

    Focuses on the questions concerning the United States Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) of 1996. Credit allocation concern; Complicated and contentious debate over CRA; Denial of bank merger or expansion approval; Equation of CRA with mortgage lending.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics