TITLE

Do Government Bureaucrats make Effective Use of Performance Management Information?

AUTHOR(S)
Heinrich, Carolyn J.
PUB. DATE
July 1999
SOURCE
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory;Jul99, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p363
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Questions the effective use of the 1982 United States Job Training Partnership Act performance standards by government bureaucrats. Conclusion as to the design of the performance standards system; State of correlation with program goals; Negative implications of cost-per-placement considerations.
ACCESSION #
2133598

 

Related Articles

  • Benefiting from Industrial Training Through Planning and Costing. Garbutt, Douglas // Accountancy;Dec1966, Vol. 78 Issue 892, p784 

    The article discusses the framework of the Industrial Training Act 1964 in Great Britain. The law was set up by the Minister of Labour to establish a system of Industrial Training Boards. The Minister has the right to dissolve each Industrial Training Board. The organization is composed of a...

  • One-Stop Jobbing. Stanfield, Rochelle L. // National Journal;9/19/98, Vol. 30 Issue 38, p2162 

    Deals with the job-training law enacted in August 1998 in the United States. Author of the Workforce Investment Act; Target beneficiaries of the law; Benefits of the law. INSET: A third way' of job training.

  • Job-program rehab may add responsibilities. Serwach, Joseph // Crain's Detroit Business;9/02/96, Vol. 12 Issue 36, pL-3 

    Reports on the significance of a legislative proposal to require employers to tell job program coordinators exactly what qualities they're looking for in applicants, on Michigan's local job programs. Support for the legislation in the House and Senate; Changes enacted at the state level;...

  • Sea change! Miller, William H. // Industry Week/IW;9/4/95, Vol. 244 Issue 16, p33 

    Expresses concern about the effects of House and Senate bills seeking to shift 100 federal job-training programs to states on industry-government roles. Differences between the bills regarding block grants.

  • On job training.  // Nation's Business;Aug95, Vol. 83 Issue 8, p68 

    Seeks views on the US Congress' plan to reorganize the federal government's employment, education and training programs.

  • Job training consolidation bill aims for more state say. Lowe, Roger K. // Crain's Cleveland Business;06/08/98, Vol. 19 Issue 23, p16 

    Focuses on the efforts of Senate and House negotiators in the United States to agree on a job training consolidation bill. Details on this reform legislation; What this legislation permits states to do; Listing of differences to be dealt with by negotiators; What the reform legislation is based on.

  • New rules for Job Training Partnership Act. Laabs, Jennifer J. // Personnel Journal;Mar93, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p126 

    States that the US Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration recently published interim final rules which incorporate the amendments made to the Job Training Partnership Act.

  • How federally funded training helps business. Laabs, J.J. // Personnel Journal;Mar92, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p34 

    Gives details on the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA), the federal government's largest job-skills training program. Shows how it has helped thousands of employers such as Ross Stores, Inc. and Marriott Corp. find local disadvantaged and disabled individuals who need job training assistance. ...

  • One area of agreement. Miller, William H. // Industry Week/IW;7/3/95, Vol. 244 Issue 13, p70 

    Reports on legislative proposals to overhaul federal job-training efforts. Consolidation of 150 programs in block grants.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics