TITLE

In Texas, One County Sues Another Over Debt Service on Annexed Land

AUTHOR(S)
Albanese, Elizabeth
PUB. DATE
June 2006
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;6/19/2006, Vol. 356 Issue 32405, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the motion for intervention filed by the Denton County for the Texan district court judge to award a portion of property tax revenues collected on the property which was awarded to Tarrant County in a boundary dispute in 2005. The lawsuit originates when a chief appraiser maintained that despite the awarding of the property to Tarrant County, it will still include it in the 2006 tax rolls for Denton County.
ACCESSION #
21291964

 

Related Articles

  • RENT INCREASE ORDERED.  // Landlord v. Tenant;Jun2010, Vol. 25 Issue 12, p12 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a landlord asked the Department of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) to decide whether it could charge parking tax to rent-stabilized garage tenant.

  • SPECIAL PROBLEMS.  // Defense Counsel Journal;Oct2003 Supplement, Vol. 70 Issue 4, p49 

    Discusses some special problems that may arise from insurance-related cases in the U.S. Cases in which court stated that the insurance defense counsel may not impeach the insured in cross-examination or in closing argument; Steps defense lawyers should take in case of a surprising testimony;...

  • THIRD-PARTY CONSENT SEARCHES, THE SUPREME COURT, AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. Abrams, Sharon E. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall1984, Vol. 75 Issue 3, p963 

    This article addresses the issue of third-party consent searches in light of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Matlock v. United States. The fourth amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. This prohibition generally requires that any search be based upon a warrant issued pursuant...

  • PARTICIPATION OF THIRD PARTIES IN CIVIL PROCEEDING: COMPARISION BETWEEN THE CURRENT AND THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Saharov, N.; Gorea, B. // AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences;2012, Vol. 2, p165 

    This paperwork aims to be a comparison between the participation of third parties in the civil case as per the current regulation and the new Code of Civil Procedure, seeking to capture the new elements and highlight the utility of any change.

  • Standing in the Government's Shoes--When Can an Intervenor Appeal a District Court Decision Invalidating a Federal Agency Action? Weiland, Paul S. // Environmental Law Reporter: News & Analysis;Jun2005, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p1 

    The article discusses the circumstances under which an intervener can appeal a district court decision invalidating a federal agency action. Intervention is a procedure whereby an outsider with an interest in a lawsuit may become a party even though she is not named by the existing litigants. In...

  • Claim Against Former Directors and Officers Allowed to Proceed. Kinkaid, Alisa // Canadian Benefits & Compensation Digest;Jun2008, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p8 

    The article discusses the reversal made by the Ontario Court of Appeals on a lower court decision striking certain proceedings against third parties in a pension fund case. It is stated that the successor pension plan administrator of a number of underfunded pension plans brought the case...

  • Burford abstention in actions for damages. Yelin, Lewis // Columbia Law Review;Nov99, Vol. 99 Issue 7, p1871 

    Focuses on the applicability of Burford abstention doctrine in legal actions for damages in the United States. History and legitimacy of the Burford abstention doctrine; Violation of the principle of separation of powers and of federalism; Expansion of the Burford doctrine; Procedural...

  • Protesters fight Monarch notification affidavit. Hannigan, Michael V. // Malakoff News (TX);1/11/2008, Vol. 99 Issue 2, p1A 

    The article announces that April 8, 2008 has been chosen to be the tentative date for the preliminary hearing in the Monarch Utilities water rate case of Texas.

  • FOREIGN STATES IN AUSTRALIAN COURTS. Garnett, Richard // Melbourne University Law Review;2005, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p704 

    The increase in transnational litigation before Australian courts has also seen a rise in the number of cases involving foreign states. While a number of doctrines currently exist in Australian law that protect the interests of foreign states from adjudication, their combined effect has been to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics