Florida's State Constitutional Adjudication: A Significant Shift as Three New Memebers Take Seats
- The Supreme Court of Texas From 1989-1998: Independence Determined by Six-Year Terms. Siegel, Julie F. // Albany Law Review;1999, Vol. 62 Issue 4, p1649
Presents information on a study which explored the trends of state constitutional adjudication at the Texas Supreme Court between 1989 and 1998. Methodology for deciding issues implicating the Texas and Federal constitutions; Discussion on freedom of speech and right to privacy and equal...
- Comment. Rode, Lincoln; tenBroek, Jacobus; Epstein, Harold; Hemmings, Charles L. // California Law Review;Mar1937, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p315
Presents commentaries on various administrative cases in the U.S. Position of the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of orders of state administrative bodies on appeal from state courts; Admissibility of Congressional debates in statutory construction by the Supreme Court; Issues concerning...
- A DECADE AFTER SMITH: AN EXAMINATION OF THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS' STANCE ON THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION IN RELATION TO MINNESOTA, WASHINGTON, AND CALIFORNIA. Chun, So // Albany Law Review;2000, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p1305
Examines the New York Court of Appeals' reluctance to interpret the state's free exercise of religion clause. Mechanics of state constitutional law; Details on the United States Supreme Court case Employment Division, Department of Human Resources versus Smith; Religious history of New York;...
- Deconstructing the Constitution. Grano, Joseph D. // Academic Questions;Winter88/89, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p10
Focuses on the academic opposition to the nomination of Court of Appeals Judge Robert Bork to the Supreme Court in the United States. Reasons behind the opposition; Role of legal scholars in teaching and writing about constitutional law; Debates on the constitutional provision.
- Justice Stanley Mosk. Uelmen, Gerald F. // Albany Law Review;1999, Vol. 62 Issue 4, p1221
Features Justice Stanley Mosk of the California Supreme Court. Information on his career in California Supreme Court; Details on his movement on state constitutional law; Influence of his opinions on interpreting the California Constitution and United States Constitution.
- Adversary jurisprudence. Bork, Robert H. // New Criterion;May2002, Vol. 20 Issue 9, p4
Comments on the nomination of officials for the court of appeals in the U.S. Issues on the political struggle for control of the courts; Importance of appeals court nominees; Interpretation of the Constitution by judges.
- Court Tosses TABOR Petition. Watts, Jim // Bond Buyer;9/5/2006, Vol. 357 Issue 32459, p31
No abstract available.
- Deciding Not to Decide: A Short History of the Dixon Rule and a Way Forward. Stevens, Christopher // Arkansas Law Review (1968-present);2011, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p1122
The article presents information on the Dixon Rule, a rule which is used by the appellate courts of Arkansas to dispose of issue without deciding it because of deficiency of evidence. It discusses various applications of the rule comparing it with general ideals of adjudication. It provides...
- THE 'BERMUDA TRIANGLE?' THE CERT POOL AND ITS INFLUENCE OVER THE SUPREME COURT'S AGENDA. Palmer, Barbara // Constitutional Commentary;Spring2001, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p105
Focuses on cert pool and its influence over the agenda of the United States Supreme Court. Background on the creation of cert pool; Criticisms on the cert pool; Problems faced in the study of the cert pool; Options of clerks and justices upon the arrival of the cases in the Supreme Court.