TITLE

Private Property, Public Property: Shopping Centers and Expressive Freedom in the States

AUTHOR(S)
Friedelbaum, Stanley H.
PUB. DATE
June 1999
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;1999, Vol. 62 Issue 4, p1229
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the constitutional basis of union picketing in shopping centers in the United States. Related literature on protection of free speech in private properties during middle of nineteen forties; Review of the case of Robins versus Pruneyard Shopping Center; Other similar cases.
ACCESSION #
2129014

 

Related Articles

  • RETURNING TO THE PRUNEYARD: THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE-SANCTIONED TRESPASS IN THE NAME OF SPEECH. Sisk, Gregory C. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter2009, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p389 

    The article focuses on the constitutional legitimacy of state-sanctioned trespasses in the name of speech. The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robbins case states that the shopping center owner required by the California state court to grant political solicitation...

  • Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court (1930-1999);1999, pN.PAG 

    Presents the case Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robinsargued by the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Comments by the judges.

  • PruneYard court case.  // ICSC Dictionary of Shopping Center Terms;2005, p120 

    An encyclopedia entry for the PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins Supreme Court case, which held that the state of California can require public access to a shopping center for political petitioning under reasonable rules and regulations without violating the shopping center owner's...

  • Teacher-friendly law ruled unconstitutional.  // Curriculum Review;Mar1995, Vol. 34 Issue 7, p4 

    Reports on the unconstitutionality of a Montana state law violating freedom of speech as decided by a municipal judge. Background of the state law; Overruling of a teacher's charges on a student's obscene insult.

  • A federal appeals court. MacLachlan, Suzanne; Mutch, David // Christian Science Monitor;6/14/95, Vol. 87 Issue 139, p2 

    Reports a June 1995 ruling by a federal appeals court asking the FBI to release documents of its investigation into the 1960s free-speech movement.

  • Testing free speech. Stewart, David O. // ABA Journal;Sep94, Vol. 80 Issue 9, p44 

    Discusses several US Supreme Court cases involving the issue of freedom of speech in the United States. Aims of Supreme Court in applying the first amendment; Implications of rulings on cases.

  • Free speech in the new downtowns. Podgers, James // ABA Journal;Apr95, Vol. 81 Issue 4, p54 

    Discusses the cases `New Jersey Coalition Against War in the Middle East v. J.M.B. Realty Corp' and `Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Department of Aviation of the City of Chicago,' which concerns the First Amendment. Facts and issues in the cases.

  • Recent cases. Angstreich, Scott H. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter96, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p634 

    Reports on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision on the case Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English. Violation of the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause; Case precedents; Move towards establishing English as the official language of the United States.

  • Humor in freedom of expression decisions. Hale, F. Dennis // Editor & Publisher;10/19/96, Vol. 129 Issue 42, p64 

    Provides insights on several court cases involving freedom of speech. Author's amusement on the basic facts of speech cases; Cases with a sex angle; Landmark libel decision.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics