Destiny Cleared Up

Whalen, Robert
June 2006
Bond Buyer;6/12/2006, Vol. 356 Issue 32400, p39
Trade Publication
The article reports on the settlement deal between Robert Congel, the real estate developer who is planning to build the multibillion-dollar Destiny USA project, and the city of Syracuse, New York. The settlement deal received the approval of the Syracuse Industrial Development Agency in the first week of June 2006.


Related Articles

  • River Park Square accord reached.  // Journal of Business (10756124);12/23/2004, Vol. 19 Issue 26, pA2 

    Reports that the Spokane City Council in Washington approved a settlement agreement in the long-legal dispute between the city and the developer of River Park Square. Agreement of the developer to guarantee and repay the multimillion-dollar balance of a U.S. Housing and Urban Development loan...

  • G&S rejects settlement offer in Mount Vernon. Philippidis, Alex // Westchester County Business Journal;12/25/2000, Vol. 39 Issue 52, p5 

    Reports that developer G&S Investors LLC has rejected a proposed settlement offered Pelham, New York officials and civic leaders who spent the past year trying to tie up in court G&S's proposed retail center project in Mount Vernon. Background information on the parties' court battles over...

  • Destiny USA, one of largest building projects in U.S. history, in serious jeopardy. Murdock, James // Architectural Record;Mar2006, Vol. 194 Issue 3, p34 

    The article focuses on the challenges faced by the Destiny USA building project of Pyramid Cos. following a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court. Pyramid Cos. faces a dispute with the city of Syracuse over financing for Destiny USA. It highlights the efforts of Syracuse officials to stimulate...

  • Austin Ave. settlement in limbo. Philippidis, Alex // Westchester County Business Journal;7/2/2001, Vol. 40 Issue 27, p1 

    Reports on the pending settlement of the lawsuit filed by the members of the city council in Greenburgh, New York against the Morris Cos. Inc.'s real estate development at Austin Avenue. Issues that must be resolved in order for the second phase of the development to proceed; Opposition against...

  • Nevada stands to collect piece of builder settlement. Robison, Jennifer // Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);6/23/2008, Vol. 25 Issue 25, p17 

    The article focuses on the $182,000 to be collected by Nevada as part of a nationwide settlement between four builders and two federal agencies concerning poor runoff controls. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Justice accused that the builders Centex Corp., KB...

  • Important Judgment on Contractual Preconditions to Arbitration in the UAE.  // Law Update;1/28/2016, p22 

    The article discusses significant judgment on contractual pre-conditions to arbitration in the United Arab Emirates. Topics discussed include summary of the facts and procedural history, the ratification of the award by the Court of First Instance on May 28, 2014, and Dubai Court of Cassation...

  • Crown hit by heavy bank charge. Coffer, Adam // EG: Estates Gazette;5/17/2003, Issue 320, p35 

    Reports on the legal action taken by Lloyds TSB against Crown Estate property company for the proposed redevelopment of Crown Estate's Chesham House. Amount of compensation to be paid by Crown to Lloyds under an out-of-court settlement agreement; Status of the lease of Lloyds at the Chesham...

  • Pay to Pave. Pursell, Erin // Sierra;May/Jun2006, Vol. 91 Issue 3, p52 

    The article reports that in January 2006 housing developers planning to subdivide 5,400 acres in Stockton, California agreed to settle a lawsuit by paying $17.5 million to protect nearby farmland. The Sierra Club filed the suit two years ago, claiming the city had illegally approved the...

  • Pritchard Joyce & Hinds v Batcup and another. Dobson, Sally // Estates Gazette;5/16/2009, Issue 919, p110 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the respondent firm of solicitors settled a professional negligence claim that had been brought against it by clients. In Pritchard Joyce & Hinds v Batcup, it was argued that the solicitors had given negligent advice whereby the clients had been denied...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics