TITLE

Pennsylvania v. Nelson

PUB. DATE
August 2017
SOURCE
Pennsylvania v. Nelson;8/1/2017, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Primary Source Document
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents the case Pennsylvania v. Nelson argued before the US Supreme Court in April of 1956. Opening arguments; Conclusions of the court; Comments of judges.
ACCESSION #
21213231

 

Related Articles

  • Inequitable Escheat?: Reflecting on Unclaimed Property Law and the Supreme Court's Interstate Escheat Framework. BOWER, T. CONRAD // Ohio State Law Journal;2013, Vol. 74 Issue 3, p515 

    The article reflects on the unclaimed property law in the U.S. which is used as a tool for aggressive revenue generation by states facing significant budget shortfalls. It discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's interstate escheat framework and presents its decision in Pennsylvania v. New York and...

  • Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company.  // Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company;8/1/2017, p1 

    Presents the case Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company presented before the United States Supreme Court in March of 1895. History of the case; Arguments; Opinions of Court; Comments of the Judges.

  • The judicial branch: The Supreme Court.  // World Almanac for Kids;1996, p219 

    Focuses on the Supreme Court, the highest court in the United States. Information about the nine justices that are appointed by the president; Their duties; Importance of the decisions that they make; Picture showing the justices from 1995 through 1996.

  • Supreme Court ruling lets airlines assure jobs to strike breakers. Mecham, M. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;3/6/1989, Vol. 130 Issue 10, p67 

    Reports on a Supreme Court ruling that airline managers can assure jobs to employees who abandon picket lines, regardless of seniority rules, giving airlines a powerful strike-breaking tool but adding new hurdles for settlement conferences.

  • Rebuilding set aside programs. Simms, M.C. // Black Enterprise;Sep90, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p33 

    Considers the implications of the US Supreme Court ruling on minority set aside programs in the case `The City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co.' Key issues faced; Recommended strategies for re-establishing minority set asides.

  • The Supreme Court and enforcement of African American rights: Myth and reality. Agyeman, O. // Black Scholar;Summer91, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p22 

    Argues that the US Supreme Court set out to usurp power that does not properly belong to it in a democracy. Other important assumptions made about the role and functioning of the high court; Landmark Supreme Court decisions; The notion of the Supreme Court's role as the guardian of minority rights.

  • The judicial confirmation process. Katzmann, R.A. // Brookings Review;Winter92, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p5 

    Opinion. Discusses the recent cries from across the political spectrum for reform of the judicial confirmation process. Ideology of judicial nominees; Divided government; Interest groups; What has changed about process; Balance of responsibility between president and Senate; Other issues involved.

  • Evidentiary Legerdemain: Deciding when Daubert should apply to social science evidence. Renaker, Theresa S. // California Law Review;Dec96, Vol. 84 Issue 6, p1657 

    Examines the US Supreme Court's decision concerning the Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and applications in lower courts. Function of a specialized knowledge testimony; Focus on problems presented by expert psychological testimony; Presentation of a functional test that courts should...

  • Supreme Court Rulings.  // Congressional Digest;Aug/Sep90, Vol. 69 Issue 8/9, p201 

    Summarizes the six Supreme Court decisions targeted by the Civil Rights Act of 1990, including `Patterson v. McLean Credit Union,' `Martin v. Wilks' and `Lorance v. AT&T Technologies.'

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics