New Hampshire Resolution

August 2017
New Hampshire Resolution;8/1/2017, p538
Primary Source Document
Presents resolutions of the New Hampshire and Vermont legislatures from 1799, opposing resolutions made by Virginia and Kentucky in 1798 on the United States' Alien and Sedition Bills. Virginia and Kentucky's resolutions regarding the constitutionality of these bills; View of New Hampshire and Vermont that questions of constitutionality belong to the federal judiciary, not to the states.


Related Articles

  • Kentucky Resolutions.  // Kentucky Resolutions;8/1/2017, p1 

    Presents the text of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798. Delineation of the powers of the federal government; Protests against the Sedition Act of 1798; Protest against the authority of the federal government to regulate aliens; Other protests against the Sedition Act.

  • Rhode Island to Virginia.  // Rhode Island to Virginia;8/1/2017, p533 

    Presents a message from the Rhode Island General Assemby to the Virginia legislature, dated February 1799, regarding certain resolutions of the Virginia legislature on the Constitution of the United States. The Virginia resolutions, passed on December 21, 1798, to make the state the final...

  • Reassessing Responses to the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions. BIRD, WENDELL // Journal of the Early Republic;Winter2015, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p519 

    The article examines how other states responded to the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions drafted respectively by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson that declared the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 unconstitutional and called for their repeal. Topics covered include the opposition of New England...

  • ANNALS OF LAW: THE LIBERTY OF EVERY MAN-II. Harris, Richard // New Yorker;11/10/1975, Vol. 51 Issue 38, p54 

    The article relates the experience of Alan McSurely and his wife when they were arrested in the summer of 1967 and charged with sedition against the State of Kentucky for their attempts to organize poor people and persuade them to demand their rights as citizens. The couple were confident that...

  • VIRGINIA AND KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS.  // Reader's Companion to American History;1991, p1121 

    The article reports on the issues related to the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and 1799. It states that the Resolutions raised the question of states rights' and nullification. It adds that the Resolutions are best understood in the context of the fierce political battles between...

  • The loophole we can't close. Starr, Paul // American Prospect;Jan/Feb98, Issue 36, p6 

    Presents the author's perception regarding the Sedition Act of 1798. Significance to political speech; Why the act was deemed a political failure; Suggested impact on governmental proceedings.

  • Mr. Starr's rendition of the Sedition Act. Schorr, Daniel // Christian Science Monitor;3/6/98, Vol. 90 Issue 69, p15 

    Expresses relief that the Sedition Act of 1798 is not still in effect in the United States in 1998. What that act prohibited; How it could be misused, particularly by independent counselor Kenneth Starr; What Richard Nixon might have done with a Sedition Act.

  • Resolutions in General Assembly.  // Resolutions in General Assembly;8/1/2017, p1 

    Presents the Resolutions made in General Assembly protesting the alien and sedition laws of 1798. Resolutions on the proper role of the federal government.

  • Persuasion vs. Power to Suppress.  // Public Relations Quarterly;Summer66, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p32 

    Focuses on the article 'Congressional History of the 1798 Sedition Law,' by John D. Stevens in the 'Journalism Quarterly,' volume 43, number 2. Outlawing of some forms of free expression and of public debate; Test of the protections previously existent for those who wished to express themselves...


Other Topics