TITLE

KELO V. CITY OF NEW LONDON–WRONGLY DECIDED AND A MISSED OPPORTUNITY FOR PRINCIPLED LINE DRAWING WITH RESPECT TO EMINENT DOMAIN TAKINGS

AUTHOR(S)
Delogu, Orlando E.
PUB. DATE
April 2006
SOURCE
Maine Law Review;2006, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p18
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the final ruling of the Supreme Court in Connecticut on the "Kelo v. City of New London" court case. A mistake in relation to the establishment of a principled line with respect to the eminent domain taking powers was found on the court's final decision. The author stressed that the Kelo case was wrongly decided.
ACCESSION #
21143332

 

Related Articles

  • When Good is Bad: Good v. United States and Reasonable Investment- Backed Expectations. Hymas, David // Ecology Law Quarterly;2001, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p431 

    In Good v. United States the Federal Circuit tried to clarify the parameters of the reasonable investment-backed expectations test. In ruling against Good's regulatory takings claim, the court held that Good had actual and constructive knowledge of the regulations limiting the use of his...

  • Comment on Recent Cases. A.T.W.; E.W.D.; A.M.K.; W.C.J.; P.L.F.; O.K.M.; E.M.C. // California Law Review;Nov17, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p69 

    Comments on various cases filed in the U.S. in 1917. Miscarriage of justice; Eminent domain; Validity of agreements relating to divorce.

  • Decide "public use" before condemnation.  // Planning;Apr2009, Vol. 75 Issue 4, p7 

    The article discusses an appeals court case involving the town of Stockton, California and the owners of Marina Towers, LLC. It reversed and remanded a 2003 court decision that approved the town's condemnation and taking of Marina Towers property without first specifying the proposed use of the...

  • Palazzio v. Rhode Island: Ripeness and 'Notice' Rule Clarified and Statutory 'Background Principles' Narrowed. Callies, David L.; Chipchase, Calvert G. // Urban Lawyer;Fall2001, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p907 

    Analyzes the Palazzio versus Rhode Island U.S. Supreme Court case on the law of property takings. Facts on the case; Claims of the plaintiff against the state of Rhode Island; Outcome of the case.

  • The third lawsuit in October. Haltom, Bill // Tennessee Bar Journal;Sep2004, Vol. 40 Issue 9, p34 

    Presents the case "Crimson Tide v. Vols" in Tennessee. Basis of the ruling of the court; Claims of the lawsuits; Decision of the court.

  • SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF STATE-COURT DETERMINATIONS OF STATE LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL CASES. Monaghan, Henry Paul // Columbia Law Review;Dec2003, Vol. 103 Issue 8, p1919 

    The decision in Bush v. Gore and particularly Chief Justice Rehnquist's concurring opinion were widely criticized for their unwarranted intrusion upon the "authoritative" status of the Florida Supreme Court in determining the meaning of Florida election law. This Article rejects the merits of...

  • HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE BALANCE -- HATTON AND MARCIC. Layard, Antonia // Environmental Law Review;2004, Vol. 6 Issue 3, p196 

    Discusses two human rights cases in Great Britain. "Hatton v United Kingdom"; "Marcic v Thames Water".

  • The Second Dartmouth College Case.  // National Review;8/5/1988, Vol. 40 Issue 15, p20 

    Focuses on a series of lawsuits filed against Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire. Draconian disciplinary sentences received by three students for participating in a brief and nonviolent confrontation with a black music professor; Questions of constitutional law and public policy.

  • Sugar Magnolia standoff headed for a court battle. Miller, Holly // New Orleans CityBusiness (1994 to 2008);9/20/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 12, p7 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by Sugar Magnolia against O.J. Hooter of Irish Channel Properties Inc. in New Orleans, Louisiana. Details of the lawsuit; Eviction proceedings against Steve McKenna.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics