Calabresi, Steven G.; Lindgren, James
June 2006
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Summer2006, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p669
Academic Journal
The article focuses on the life tenure rule for the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. The authors believe the constitutional rule granting life tenure to Supreme Court Justices is fundamentally flawed, resulting in Justices remaining on the Court for longer periods. This trend has led to significantly less frequent vacancies on the Court, which reduces the efficacy of the democratic check that the appointment process provides on the Court's membership.


Related Articles

  • Long quiet, justices end term with a growl. Sherman, Mark // Buffalo Law Journal;7/3/2008, Vol. 80 Issue 53, p1 

    The article focuses on the pattern of decision-making among U.S. Supreme Court justices on court cases in 2008. According to the author, they showed remarkable restraint and displayed broad agreement even in some volatile areas and refrained from angry dissents. However, in three recent cases,...

  • THE FOUR PILLARS OF CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE. Sherry, Suzanna // Cardozo Law Review;Jan2011, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p969 

    The article elaborates the four fundamental principles of the U.S. constitutional doctrine. It recalls the legal analysis, judicial craftmanship, constitutional aspiration, and the human understanding. It provides a practical illustration of these essential pillars by using them to test the...

  • Judicial dictatorship. Quirk, William J. // Society;Jan/Feb94, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p34 

    This article discusses the judicial power of the U.S. Supreme Court. According to the article judges in European countries do not declare legislative acts to be illegal. A European intellectual, looking at the Supreme Court's unreviewable power to do so, would probably say the U.S. is an...

  • THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.  // United States Government Manual;2005/2006, p65 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court and its judicial power. The Supreme Court is comprised of the chief justice of the U.S. and associate justices. Congress has no authority to change the original jurisdiction of this Court. Congress has from time to time conferred upon...

  • YOUR HONOR, PLEASE EXPLAIN: WHY CONGRESS CAN, AND SHOULD, REQUIRE JUSTICES TO PUBLISH REASONS FOR THEIR RECUSAL DECISIONS. Levy, Suzanne // University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law;Apr2014, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p1161 

    The article focuses on the constitutional regulation of the U.S Supreme Court's decision in judicial recusals by the U.S Congress. Topics discussed include the doctrine of inherent judicial powers, the separation of powers that may restrict Congress from applying substantive rules on the judges'...

  • How court keeps its squeaky-clean image. Richey, Warren // Christian Science Monitor;6/30/99, Vol. 91 Issue 150, p2 

    Details the controversial decisions sharply limiting the power of the United States federal government to regulate the states. Importance that individual justices place on public perception of the court; The nation's strong, positive feelings for the important institution; How any criticism of...

  • Court Jesters. Armstrong, William L. // National Review;2/10/1997, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p34 

    The article focuses on the issue of abuse of power by the U.S. Supreme Court. The stakes are magnified by the re-election of U.S. President Bill Clinton. It is possible that Clinton will have the opportunity to nominate one or more members of the High Court. Most Americans did not pay attention...

  • Conservatism at the High Court. Kilpatrick, James K. // National Review;8/7/1981, Vol. 33 Issue 15, p893 

    The articles presents a commentary on the activities of the U.S. Supreme Court as of August 1981 and their practice of judicial restraint. It cites some cases wherein the U.S. Congress deferred to Congress or to the Executive Department. It presents information on the judgments of the U.S....

  • The 'Judicial Philosophy' Dodge. Carter, Stephen L. // Christianity Today;Jan2006, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p66 

    This article considers the claim that in order to be appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court, potential justices should hold the right judicial philosophy. The author distinguishes the meaning between adjudication and legislation. According to him, conservatives tend to exalt one case and liberals...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics