TITLE

20003: Preserving Consumer Choice in an Era of Religious/Secular Health Industry Mergers (Position Paper)

PUB. DATE
March 2001
SOURCE
American Journal of Public Health;Mar2001, Vol. 91 Issue 3, p479
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines the effect of religious or secular hospital mergers on patients' access to health services in the U.S. Patients are losing access to many reproductive health services when their local secular hospitals merge with nearby religiously-affiliated facilities that object to those services on ethical grounds. Services banned by the merged entity may include contraception, abortions, sterilizations, in vitro fertilization, emergency contraception for rape victims, and the discussion of condom use as part of HIV prevention counseling. Formerly secular hospitals and nursing homes also restrict end-of-life choices. Recommendations to the American Public Health Association are presented.
ACCESSION #
21115917

 

Related Articles

  • How Merging Religious and Secular Hospitals Can Threaten Health Care Services. Uttley, Lois J. // Social Policy;Spring2000, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p4 

    This article discusses how merging religious and secular hospitals can threaten health care services. There is a growing threat to U.S. physicians and their patients, brought by the spread of restrictive religious health-care rules. Already struggling with health maintenance organization...

  • Dying at home: access should be equitable. Goodman, Claire // British Journal of Community Nursing;Sep2010, Vol. 15 Issue 9, p419 

    The author reflects on the current state of end-of-life care in Great Britain as of September 2010. He cites the report from the National End of Life Care Intelligence Network (NEoLCIN), which presents the variations in place of death in England. The report showed that majority of deaths...

  • Is there a duty to die? Hardwig, John // Hastings Center Report;Mar/Apr97, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p34 

    Discusses the moral and ethical aspects of a patient's right to die to avoid the burden of chronic illness. Individual's right to health care and the right to live; Financial costs of prolonged illness; Objections to a duty to die; Right of the incompetent to die.

  • Allowing or causing: another look. Clouser, K. Danner; Clouser, K D // Annals of Internal Medicine;Nov77, Vol. 87 Issue 5, p622 

    If "allowing to die" is really different from "causing to die," it is so on a much more subtle level than is generally thought. Efforts to compare the two by locating "cause" have been mistaken. What is really at issue is the location of moral responsibility. The physician has an obligation to...

  • Letting Patients Die: Legal and Moral Reflections. Kadish, Sanford H. // California Law Review;Jul92, Vol. 80 Issue 4, p857 

    Fifty years of medical advances have profoundly challenged some of our most deeply held moral belie~ about life and death. Doctors and hospitals that once would have prolonged life now routinely discontinue life-sustaining treatment. Professor Kadish examines the legal and moral aspects of these...

  • Comment on Re B (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) (2002) 2 All England Reports 449. Stauch, M. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Aug2002, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p232 

    The judgment handed down in the case of Ms B confirms the right of the competent patient to refuse medical treatment even if the result is death. The case does, however, raise some interesting legal points. The facility for conscientious objection by doctors has not previously been explicitly...

  • Ms B and Diane Pretty: a commentary. Singer, P. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Aug2002, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p234 

    In two recent court cases, Ms B, a paralysed competent adult, was allowed to end her life; Mrs Pretty, another paralysed competent adult, was not. In legal terms, the essential difference between the two cases is that Ms B was seeking the withdrawal of treatment, whereas Mrs Pretty was asking...

  • Grasping the nettle--what to do when patients withdraw their consent for treatment: (a clinical perspective on the case of Ms B). Tweeddale, M. G. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Aug2002, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p236 

    Withdrawal of active treatment is common in medical practice, especially in critical care medicine. Usually, however, it involves patients who are unable to take part in the decision making process. As the case of Ms B shows, doctors are sometimes reluctant to withdraw active treatment when the...

  • The case of Ms B: suicide's slippery slope? Keown, J. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Aug2002, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p238 

    In the case of Ms B, the High Court ruled that as Ms B was a competent adult patient, her doctors acted unlawfully in overriding her refusal of life-preserving ventilation. This commentary considers whether this case supports the proposition that in English law the right to refuse treatment...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics