Limited medical options: Look carefully before you leap

Robertson, Brian
June 2006
Employee Benefit News;Jun2006, Vol. 20 Issue 7, p38
Provides suggestions for employers in evaluating limited medical programs. Prevalent participants in limited medical plans; Tips for employee benefits professionals in limited medical plans; Factors to consider regarding limited medical plans including pre-existing condition limitation and co-pay; Role of administration in selecting a limited medical plan.


Related Articles

  • Employers Paying Now to Save Later. MASTERSON, LES // HealthLeaders Magazine;Jun2009, Vol. 12 Issue 6, p58 

    The article reports that employers in the U.S. are adopting value-based insurance design (VBID), a concept which aims to lessen copayments for medications and services that are most beneficial. It is noted that pioneers of VBID, such as Pitney Bowes and Marriott, have posted better cost and...

  • Take Care to Communicate Health Care Costs. Pyrillis, Rita // Workforce;Mar2014, Vol. 93 Issue 3, p14 

    The article says that the employees' share of health care benefits and other out-of-pocket expenses has increased significantly in the U.S., however the medical care cost has increased due to the availability of better services and technologies, and employers' share of these costs have also...

  • More prescription drug plans try coinsurance. Elswick, Jill // Employee Benefit News;2/1/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p34 

    Provides information on the drug benefit designs used by U.S. employers to control prescription drug spending. Effect of the three-tier copay structures for prescription drugs on the company's drug spending; Reasons for the popularity of three-tier plans in prescription drug benefit plans;...

  • Study: higher co-pays save employers $305 per year per worker.  // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;7/2/2007, Vol. 36 Issue 52, p1 

    The article focuses on a research from the University of Utah Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center and Intermountain Healthcare on the effect of higher prescription co-payments on the costs of employer-sponsored health plans and total health care costs. It has found that employers have saved...

  • Study Smaller Firms Trimming Benefits. Marshall, Jeffrey; Heffes, Ellen M. // Financial Executive;Sep2004, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p11 

    The article reports that health plan benefits were cut by small and mid-sized U.S. employers in 2003. The total cost of health benefits per employee, according to a survey by Marsh Inc., averaged out to $6,130 in 2003. Small employers have been imposing high deductibles and discouraging the...

  • Job-Based Health Insurance: Costs Climb At A Moderate Pace. Claxton, Gary; DiJulio, Bianca; Whitmore, Heidi; Pickreign, Jeremy; McHugh, Megan; Finder, Benjamin; Osei-Anto, Awo // Health Affairs;2009 Web Exclusives from 28-6, Vol. 28, pw1002 

    Each year the Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer Health Benefits takes a snapshot of the state of employee benefits in the United States, based on interviews with public and private employers. Our findings for 2009 show that families continue to face higher premiums, up about 5 percent from last...

  • eye to eye on vision. Carlson, Leah // Employee Benefit News;4/15/2004, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p36 

    Focuses on vision care benefits offered by U.S. employers to their employees as of April 2004. Estimated percentage of companies which extended vision benefits to workers in 2003; Percentage of the plans offered by vision plan provider Spectera which were offered on a voluntary or...

  • BY THE NUMBERS: Health plan premium increases slowing.  // Employee Benefit News;May2014, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p50 

    Statistics are presented from the 2014 ADP Annual Health Benefits Report in the U.S. including the largest percentage increase in health plan premiums, the overall average percentage of employees participating in health benefits and average total employer contribution to premiums.

  • Employers Warn of Cuts With Prop 72 Leading. Reed, Vita // Orange County Business Journal;10/25/2004, Vol. 27 Issue 43, p1 

    Reports on the response of employers to Proposition 72 in Orange County, California. Likelihood of employers to reduce benefits to lessen the impact of the healthcare coverage; Impact of the passage of Proposition 72 on employers; Requirements needed for employers to comply under the Proposition 72.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics