TITLE

U.S. court affirms Dimplex $12.4M patent judgment

PUB. DATE
May 2006
SOURCE
Furniture/Today;5/29/2006, Vol. 30 Issue 37, p34
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on electric fireplace manufacturer Dimplex North America's announcement that a U.S. Court has affirmed a multimillion patent infringement judgment the company has won in 2005 against CFM Corp. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal District denied an appeal by CFM of a judgment entered after a jury trial in a federal court in Illinois.
ACCESSION #
20992863

 

Related Articles

  • Federal Circuit Recognizes Prosecution Laches as Defense to Patent Infringement. Devinsky, Paul; Ferguson, Brian E. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q1, p1 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on the court case Symbol Technologies Inc. versus Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation. The Court affirmatively recognized prosecution laches as a defense to patent infringement for the first time.

  • New Life for Doctrine of Equivalents. Blinkova, Natalia; Devinsky, Paul // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q2, p1 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit declaring that the prosecution history of one patent does not bar equivalents for claims of another patent where the two patents share no formal relationship and were presented to the patent office as...

  • Words May Limit a Claim, but a Picture Has Multiple Meanings. Devinsky, Paul; Etienne-Cummings, Shamita D. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q2, p1 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturning a summary judgment of no literal infringement, determining that a district court improperly limited the scope for a claim term to the structure illustrated in the patent drawings. A stationary...

  • Concession of Validity in Consent Judgment is Limited to Prior Infringing Product Only. Devinsky, Paul // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q2, p1 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversing the decision of a district court declaring that a consent judgment that included a concession of validity did not remove the defendant from asserting an invalidity defense where the product in issue...

  • In re Seagate Technology, LLC: The Federal Circuit Abolishes the Duty of Due Care in Willfulness Cases.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2007 Q3, p1 

    The article examines various lawsuits wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued decisions that abolish the duty of due care in willful patent infringement. In the 1983 case Underwater Devices Inc. versus Morrison-Knudsen Co., the court ruled that an infringer has an...

  • SanDisk's Patent Infringement Suit Reinstated.  // Electronic News;7/18/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 29, pN.PAG 

    Reports on the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to reverse a summary judgment ruling of non-infringement by a California District Court regarding the patent infringement case of SanDisk Corp. Response of the company to the ruling; Coverage of the company's patent...

  • Federal Circuit Gives Big Nod to the Patent Office.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q3, Special section p1 

    The article reports on a ruling of the U.S. Federal Circuit which made the scope of the substantial new question of patentability requirement used in reexamination proceedings clear. Under the ruling, defendants in patent infringement suits have the option of questioning the validity of asserted...

  • Factual Dispute Created by Expert Testimony? No Summary Judgment. Nagel, Stephanie L. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q2, p1 

    The article reports on the ruling of a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversing-in-part the decision of a district court on a case filed by Leggett & Platt Inc. against Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co. arguing that the lower court erred in granting summary judgment...

  • Verdict Against Makers of Blackberry Mostly Upheld. Doyle, David C.; Jacobs, Michael A.; Kramer, Brian M. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q4, p1 

    The article focuses on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on the patent infringement lawsuit filed against Research-In-Motion by NTP Inc. The Court ruled that Research-In-Motion's system of delivering electronic messages to the Blackberry wireless handheld device...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics