Pima County, Ariz., OKs $2.1B Plan; Mesa Rejects Property Tax

Watts, Jim
May 2006
Bond Buyer;5/18/2006, Vol. 356 Issue 32384, p6
Trade Publication
The article reports on the different reactions of the voters in Arizona to several bonds proposed by the state. Pima county residents approved the 2.1 billion dollars' budget for regional transportation projects, while Tempe voters permitted the 210.5 million in bonds for street improvement and public safety initiatives. However, residents in Mesa disapproved the city's request to enforce a property tax.


Related Articles

  • OKLAHOMA: DHS Gets $23M Bond Nod. Watts, Jim // Bond Buyer;12/4/2007, Vol. 362 Issue 32766, p9 

    The article reports that the Oklahoma Council of Bond Oversight has approved a request by the state Department of Human Services (DHS) to issue up to $23 million of revenue bonds for projects in Tulsa, Ada, and Sapulpa. The Oklahoma Development Finance Authority will lease the buildings to DHS...

  • Airport Gets Lease Money. Carvlin, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;10/18/2006, Vol. 358 Issue 32489, p35 

    The article provides updates on the expansion of the Gary/Chicago International Airport. The state of Indiana forwarded $20 million to the Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority to fund the airport's runway expansion. The Regional Development Authority was created to help boost...

  • MARYLAND: Charles County Preps $47M. Sanchez, Humberto // Bond Buyer;3/17/2008, Vol. 363 Issue 32837, p9 

    The article reports on the issuance of $47 million general obligation bonds on March 25, 2008 in Charles County, Maryland. It will include $27 million of tax-exempt bonds and $20 million of taxable debt. Bond proceeds will be used to fund various capital projects, including a stadium complex and...

  • N.J. agency caps fees for projects over $100 million. Hoffman, David // Bond Buyer;01/21/99, Vol. 327 Issue 30562, p31 

    Reports on the New Jersey Economic Development Authority's attempt to give developers planning projects costing over $100 million in the state a break by capping bond fees paid for state financing. Amount of cap agreed upon by the authority's board of directors in November 1998; Details of a...

  • Ala. Lawmakers OK Gov.'s Bond Increase. Sigo, Shelly // Bond Buyer;3/5/2007, Vol. 359 Issue 32579, p1 

    The article reports on the approval of Governor Bob Riley's proposal to provide an additional $400 million of bonds for economic development projects by the Legislature in Alabama. A portion of the bonds will be used in combination with $900 million of Gulf Opportunity Zone Act bonds to lure a...

  • LOUISIANA: A Panoply of Bond Bills. Sigo, Shelly // Bond Buyer;1/29/2009, Vol. 367 Issue 33051, p9 

    The article reports on the outstanding bond bills filed by lawmakers in Mississippi. These bond bills, which surfaced in prior legislative sessions, cited to authorize debt to build a stadium at Jackson State University, authorized debt for museums, state facilities, and loans for...

  • Frisco, Tex., Putting $198M of Bonds, Arts District Before Voters. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;9/12/2002, Vol. 341 Issue 31469, p3 

    Reports the decision of Dallas suburb of Frisco on the 197.5 million dollars general obligation bond in Texas. Proposal to finance capital projects of four-city arts district; Approval on 40 million dollars election by voters; Estimation of 16 million dollars short-term holding facility for the...

  • D.C. raises issue by $50 million for management projects. Resnick, Amy B. // Bond Buyer;03/19/98, Vol. 323 Issue 30354, p4 

    Reports that the government of Washington, D.C. has raised the amount of bonds it plans to issue in March 1998 to $200 million from $150 million in order to raise $50 million for management reform projects. District's capital deficit for schools and transportation; Elimination of the...

  • Kansas City, Mo., to clear bond slate for coming project. Williamson, Tammy // Bond Buyer;03/25/98, Vol. 323 Issue 30358, p26 

    Reports on the plan of Kansas City, Missouri to sell bonds in the spring of 1998 to finance a $454 million entertainment district as its economic development project. Inclusion of a $14 million water revenue bond deal and $40 million of water refunding bonds; Possible refund of a roughly $50...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics