TITLE

Wisconsin Senate Kills Amendment To Curb Spending Growth, Borrowing

AUTHOR(S)
Shields, Yvette
PUB. DATE
May 2006
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;5/8/2006, Vol. 356 Issue 32376, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article reports that Wisconsin Republican and Democratic legislators voted to kill a proposed constitutional amendment that would have restricted the future growth of state public expenditures and public debt practices. Under the amendment, the state could issue bonds for clean water, veterans home loans, transportation, and building projects.
ACCESSION #
20809301

 

Related Articles

  • House Passes Budget Plan. Watts, Jim // Bond Buyer;2/27/2007, Vol. 359 Issue 32576, p9 

    The article reports that New Mexico House has passed a proposed budget plan for 2008 to the Senate, where it is expected to grow as lawmakers add programs and expenditures. The $5.6-billion state budget increases state spending by 10.6% from fiscal 2007, or some $540 million. According to...

  • Should The Public Debt Limit Be Raised At This Time? PRO. Byrnes, John W. // Congressional Digest;Oct53, Vol. 32 Issue 10, p250 

    The article presents views of the author on the bill H.R. 6672, in the U.S. House for raising the public debt limit. There is only one reason for increasing this ceiling, and that is to provide a margin of safety in the day-to-day fiscal operations. The general trend of expenditures is down. The...

  • Philly Gets More Time for Lawmakers to OK Budget. Kaske, Michelle // Bond Buyer;9/14/2009, Vol. 369 Issue 33182, p32 

    The article reports on the grant received by the state government of Philadelphia for an additional time to receive legislative approval for initiatives that would help the city to balance its fiscal 2010 budget in Pennsylvania. The state legislators announce a bipartisan agreement that would...

  • Hungary.  // Nuclear Law Bulletin;2006, Issue 77, p56 

    The article provides information on the amendment to Hungary's 1996 Act on Atomic Energy. The purpose of the amendment is to facilitate the State Audit Office's auditing of the management of the Central Nuclear Financial Fund, to ensure that municipal subsidies are used exclusively to cover the...

  • CPAs unveil fiscal reform proposal. Carmona, José L. // Caribbean Business;6/19/2008, Vol. 36 Issue 24, p9 

    The article offers information on the fiscal reform proposal unveiled by Puerto Rico Society of Certified Accountants. It presents several recommendations included in the proposal which includes the amending of constitution to prohibit the issuance of debt to balance the general budget or to...

  • Does the U.S. Need a Balanced Budget Amendment?  // U.S. News Digital Weekly;4/22/2011, Vol. 3 Issue 16, p13 

    The author argues that the U.S. needs a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. He mentions the increase in national debt from about 5 trillion dollars in 1997 to more than 14 trillion dollars. He explains that the amendment would require the submission of a balanced budget to Congress...

  • DiNapoli: 'Shadow Government' Public Authorities Pile on Debt. Burton, Paul // Bondbuyer.com;12/23/2014, p33 

    The article reports on the spending of public authorities of New York State as of December 2014. It makes reference to a report by Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli and deals with topics including the increase on spending to 3.5 billion U.S. dollars from the last report in 2013, combined debt of state...

  • Surprise! Oklahoma Voters Defeat Fuel-Tax Hike By Record Margin. Watts, Jim // Bond Buyer;9/15/2005, Vol. 353 Issue 32218, p6 

    Reports on the rejection of higher fuel taxes by the Oklahoma voters. Defeat of a state question put on the ballot through initiative petition process; Proposal of amending the state constitution to establish the Oklahoma Bridge and Highway Fund; Refusal of the public to fund road improvements...

  • Constitutional Tinkering.  // National Review;5/11/1979, Vol. 31 Issue 19, p642 

    The article addresses the debate surrounding the proposed constitutional amendment to limit federal spending in the United States. According to the opponents of the proposal, economic doctrine should not be written into the Constitution. In response, the author states that criticism of the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics