Paradigmatic Confusions and the Evasion of Critical Issues in Naturalistic Research

Sparkes, Andrew C.
January 1989
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education;Jan1989, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p131
Academic Journal
This paper considers the implications of claiming allegiance to the naturalistic research paradigm. It suggests that the two paradigms that presently dominate research into physical education are separate and distinct, with attempts to bring them together in a "marriage of convenience" being misguided. Claims for compatibility are focused upon in order to highlight the prevailing confusion between philosophical and technical issues in the research process which often leads to calls for methodological pluralism. These two issues are seen to be intimately linked in the production of a resonant research process that raises questions as to the appropriateness, and ability, of certain methodologies to properly reflect the epistemological framework in which they are embedded. The implications of such a linkage is explored, and naturalistic researchers are implored to reduce their parasitic reliance upon positivism by confronting the central dilemmas of engagement with their own antifoundational paradigm.


Related Articles

  • Research Paradigms and Their Use and Importance in Theological Inquiry and Education. Mittwede, Steven K. // Journal of Education & Christian Belief;Spring2012, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p23 

    A survey and analysis of four major research paradigms--positivism, postpositivism, critical theory and constructivism--reveal that all have been applied effectively in recent theological inquiry. Although these paradigms might resemble worldviews to some extent, they are not so...

  • What is a philosophical stance? Paradigms, policies and perspectives. Boucher, Sandy // Synthese;Jul2014, Vol. 191 Issue 10, p2315 

    Since van Fraassen first put forward the suggestive idea that many philosophical positions should be construed as 'stances' rather than factual beliefs, there have been various attempts to spell out precisely what a philosophical stance might be, and on what basis one should be adopted. In this...

  • Systemic knowledge management in hydraulic systems: I. A postulate on paradigm shifts as a methodological tool. Rahman Khatibi // Journal of Hydroinformatics;Apr2003, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p127 

    Unravelling transparency among the various disciplines of science in the context of their evolving processes is a methodological problem and the focus of a series of two papers presented here. This first paper presents the concept of the paradigm as a generic problem-solving tool for creating...

  • Qualitative and Quantitative Research: Paradigmatic Differences. Arghode, Vishal // Global Education Journal;2012, Vol. 2012 Issue 4, p155 

    The paper defines qualitative and quantitative research. Subsequently, the two broad research fields are analyzed and compared on the basis of ontological, epistemological, and methodological differences. The underlying assumptions of the quantitative and qualitative research methods are also...

  • LOS PARADIGMAS DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA. Ramos, Carlos Alberto // Avances en Psicología;ene-jul2015, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p9 

    Positivism, post-positivism, critical theory and constructivism are the paradigms that support scientific research. It is important for a researcher knows which of them is positioned for being a clear conception of the reality of phenomenon under study. In this article a review is made of these...

  • The integration of the psycho-narrative paradigm in the theory of Organizational Communication. Berros, Jesús Bermejo // Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change;Nov2012, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p227 

    Organizational Communication underwent considerable development and progress throughout the twentieth century, which enabled an extensive corpus of descriptive and applied-prescriptive studies and theories to be built up. Analysis of the proposed models demonstrates that previous studies and...

  • Empirical Business Ethics Research and Paradigm Analysis. Brand, V. // Journal of Business Ethics;Jun2009, Vol. 86 Issue 4, p429 

    Despite the so-called ‘paradigm wars’ in many social sciences disciplines in recent decades, debate as to the appropriate philosophical basis for research in business ethics has been comparatively non-existent. Any consideration of paradigm issues in the theoretical business ethics...

  • ONTOLOGICAL DUALITY IN SOCIAL SCIENCES. METHATHEORETICAL CLARIFICATIONS AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES. Ciortuz, Adela; Trişcă, Gelu // Annals of Eftimie Murgu University Resita, Fascicle II, Economi;2011, p388 

    The overwhelming majority of the scientific research (mainly PhD studies) in social sciences (marketing, economy, sociology and even psychology) is carried out empirically according to the positivist paradigm (positivist epistemological orientation), by methods that imply an objectivist...

  • Good Bad Consumption - Paradigm Development of Consumer Research in Finland.  // Liiketaloudellinen Aikakauskirja;2011, Issue 2, p125 

    An abstract of the study "Good Bad Consumption - Paradigm Development of Consumer Research in Finland," by Liisa Uusitalo is presented.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics