Rehnquist, William H.
March 2006
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2006, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p401
Academic Journal
The article discusses the notion of the living Constitution of U.S. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. The phrase living Constitution is really a shorthand expression that is susceptible of at least two quite different meanings. The country has a living Constitution with a vengeance. Although the substitution of some other set of values for those which may be derived from the language and intent of the framers is not urged in so many words, that is surely the thrust of the message.


Related Articles

  • DOUBLE IMMUNITY. Tang, Aaron // Stanford Law Review;Feb2013, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p279 

    The Rehnquist Court's so-called "Federalism Revolution" has received no shortage of scholarly attention. Under the conventional narrative, the Court pushed back against the encroaching tide of federal power in three spheres: it limited the scope of Congress's Commerce Clause authority, struck...

  • CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST'S ENDURING, DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTION. Garnett, Richard W. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2006, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p395 

    The article discusses the essay "The Notion of a Living Constitution," by U.S. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. His essay is about as clear, succinct, and coherent a statement of judicial philosophy as one could want. It was not to be resisted out of pious reverence for the Founders' insight...

  • REHNQUIST'S PERSPECTIVE. Marcotte, Paul // ABA Journal;Apr87, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p19 

    Presents the views of Chief Justice William Rehnquist on the U.S. Constitution. Recognition by the framers of the Constitution of the necessity of constitutional changes; Key stipulations of the Constitution that promote an independent judiciary; Separation of powers promulgated by the U.S....

  • PROGRESSIVE AND CONSERVATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM AS THE UNITED STATES ENTERS THE 21ST CENTURY. Chemerinsky, Erwin // Law & Contemporary Problems;Summer2004, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p53 

    Asserts that the U.S. Supreme Court decisions on interpreting the constitution are manifestations of a conservative politics. Conservatism of Chief Justice William Rehnquist; Differences between conservative and progressive constitutionalism; Focus of progressive constitutional scholarship.

  • MAJORITARIAN DEMOCRACY IN A FEDERALIST SYSTEM: THE LATE CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Engelken, Sheri J. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2007, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p695 

    The article focuses on the late U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist who, according to the author, is probably best remembered for the many opinions in which he found no protection afforded by the First Amendment. The author examines cases in which Rehnquist authored an opinion...

  • Flagellation. Hertzberg, H. // New Republic;7/24/89, Vol. 201 Issue 4, p4 

    Comments on issues regarding the desecration of the U.S. flag. Provision of the U.S. Constitution concerning flag burning; Arguments presented by U.S. Chief Justice William Rehnquist regarding flag burning; Statement issued by Senator Bob Dole about the burning of the U.S. flag; Reaction of...

  • A trial or a deal? Lavelle, Marianne // U.S. News & World Report;12/28/98-01/04/99, Vol. 125 Issue 25, p25 

    Discusses the outlook for a Senate impeachment trial of United States President Bill Clinton. White House desire for a speedy resolution of the issue; Hillary Clinton's role in the president's Senate defense strategy; Questions about how long, how disruptive and how salacious a Senate trial...

  • National Policy Preferences and Judicial Review of State Statutes at the United States Supreme Court. Lindquist, Stefanie A.; Corley, Pamela C. // Publius: The Journal of Federalism;Apr2013, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p151 

    This article explores the determinants of U.S. Supreme Court justices’ voting behavior in cases involving constitutional challenges to state statutes, with a particular focus on the degree to which majoritarian influences—as reflected in state participation and congressional...

  • THE MAJORITARIAN REHNQUIST COURT? Devins, Neal // Law & Contemporary Problems;Summer2004, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p63 

    Presents evidence for legal scholar Robert Dahl's assertions that U.S. Supreme Court's constitutional decisions "are never for long out of line with the policy views dominant among the lawmaking majorities of the United States." Examination of recent decisions of Chief Justice William...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics