Language Deficits in Poor Comprehenders: A Case for the Simple View of Reading

Catts, Hugh W.; Adlof, Suzanne M.; Weismer, Susan Ellis
April 2006
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Apr2006, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p278
Academic Journal
Purpose: To examine concurrently and retrospectively the language abilities of children with specific reading comprehension deficits ("poor comprehenders") and compare them to typical readers and children with specific decoding deficits ("poor decoders"). Method: In Study 1, the authors identified 57 poor comprehenders, 27 poor decoders, and 98 typical readers on the basis of 8th-grade reading achievement. These subgroups' performances on 8th-grade measures of language comprehension and phonological processing were investigated. In Study 2, the authors examined retrospectively subgroups' performances on measures of language comprehension and phonological processing in kindergarten, 2nd, and 4th grades. Word recognition and reading comprehension in 2nd and 4th grades were also considered. Results: Study 1 showed that poor comprehenders had concurrent deficits in language comprehension but normal abilities in phonological processing. Poor decoders were characterized by the opposite pattern of language abilities. Study 2 results showed that subgroups had language (and word recognition) profiles in the earlier grades that were consistent with those observed in 8th grade. Subgroup differences in reading comprehension were inconsistent across grades but reflective of the changes in the components of reading comprehension over time. Conclusions: The results support the simple view of reading and the phonological deficit hypothesis. Furthermore, the findings indicate that a classification system that is based on the simple view has advantages over standard systems that focus only on word recognition and/or reading comprehension.


Related Articles

  • The Phonics Controversy.  // Education Digest;May1963, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p48 

    The article reports that the method of word recognition should have no place in serious pedagogy. It is fatal to good writing and spelling. Phonics is an extremely important step in the reading process. It is useful, important, and necessary in a good reading program, but there will always be...

  • Retention and Nonretention of At-Risk Readers in First Grade and Their Subsequent Reaching Achievement. Juel, Connie; Leavell, Judy A. // Journal of Learning Disabilities;Nov1988, Vol. 21 Issue 9 

    Examines some of the specific reasons for the success or failure of retention in the area of reading, using an in-depth study of a number of both at-risk retained first grade students and low skilled promoted children. Development in phonemic awareness, spelling-sound knowledge, word...

  • Single-Word Recognition Need Not Depend on Single-Word Features: Narrative Coherence Counteracts Effects of Single-Word Features that Lexical Decision Emphasizes. Teng, Dan; Wallot, Sebastian; Kelty-Stephen, Damian // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research;Dec2016, Vol. 45 Issue 6, p1451 

    Research on reading comprehension of connected text emphasizes reliance on single-word features that organize a stable, mental lexicon of words and that speed or slow the recognition of each new word. However, the time needed to recognize a word might not actually be as fixed as previous...

  • KIDS' CORNER.  // Scholastic News -- Edition 3;5/10/2004, Vol. 60 Issue 24, p4 

    Presents reading comprehension and word recognition quizzes based on the articles printed in the May 10, 2004 issue of "Scholastic News."

  • Dear parents: Read with your children. Glazer, Susan Mandel // Teaching Pre K-8;May98, Vol. 28 Issue 8, p96 

    Highlights different summer activities that can help maintain the students' comprehension and word recognition skills. INSET: Skills learned by retelling.

  • The effect of repeated readings on reading rate, speech pauses, and word recognition accuracy. Herman, Patricia A. // Reading Research Quarterly;Fall1985, Vol. 20 Issue 5, p553 

    OVER A THREE-MONTH PERIOD, eight less able, nonfluent intermediate-grade students in a large midwestern city chose five separate stories to practice repeatedly, following procedures outlined by Dahl (1974) and Samuels (1979). Changes in rate of reading, number of speech pauses, and word...

  • Monitoring and resolving comprehension obstacles: An Investigation of spontaneous text lookbacks among upper-grade good and poor comprehenders. Garner, Ruth; Reis, Ron // Reading Research Quarterly;1981, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p569 

    THE RESEARCH REPORTED here was designed to answer questions about spontaneous use of text look backs to resolve comprehension obstacles. Nineteen good comprehend ers and 19 poor comprehend ers were presented with a narrative passage divided into three segments. Interspersed in the text were six...

  • Levels of Comprehension Monitoring and Working Memory in Good and Poor Comprehenders. Oakhill, Jane; Hartt, Joanne; Samols, Deborah // Reading & Writing;Oct2005, Vol. 18 Issue 7-9, p657 

    This paper reports two studies that investigate differences in comprehension monitoring skills between good and poor comprehenders. Two groups of 9– to 10-year-olds, who were matched for reading vocabulary and word recognition skills but who differed in comprehension skill, were selected....

  • Every child needs success. Hillerich, Robert L. // Teaching Pre K-8;Aug/Sep90, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p106 

    Suggests ways to establish a foundation to ensure that your students' reading enthusiasm will last throughout the year. Need to establish ground rules and expectations; Ways to approach beginning levels; Sills with the printed word; Importance of context; Strategies; Comprehension skills.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics