Many Apply, Few Are Accepted

Magill, Ken
April 2006
Direct;4/1/2006, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p9
Trade Publication
Reports on the decision of Goodmail Systems to reject more than three-quarters of the companies that have applied for its Certified Email program. Reason for most of the rejections, according to Goodmail CEO Richard Gingras; Comparison of the spam complaint-rate requirements of Goodmail and America Online; Decision of America Online to adopt Goodmail's system.


Related Articles

  • 'Paid-for' email set to launch in the UK. Hummerston, Gemma // Precision Marketing;12/15/2006, Vol. 18 Issue 50, p1 

    The article reports on the invitation to the company behind the anti-spam of the Internet company AOL and Yahoo for electronic mail scheme of the Goodmail systems which is to be launch in Great Britain in the spring of 2007. The launch is claimed to be the major prosperity for electronic mail...

  • Put Up or Shut Up. Magill, Ken // Direct;3/1/2006, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p9 

    Discusses the plan of America Online to charge fees to marketers under Goodmail's certified electronic mail service. Criticisms issued by Jay Schwedelson, corporate vice president of Worldata, on the plan; Benefits of charging marketers a fee, according to Dave Lewis, vice president for market...

  • Postage Paid. Schultz, Ray // Direct;3/1/2006, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p7 

    Discusses the origin and evolutions of the direct mail system in the U.S. Proposal of America Online and Goodmail to charge mailers to have their electronic mail delivered; Features of the practical joke involving cash on delivery mail which affected farmers; Purpose of the implementation of...

  • AOL's E-mail Plan Sparks Furor. Schwartz, Ephraim // InfoWorld;3/6/2006, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p14 

    The article reports that a coalition of U.S. organizations opposes the plan of AOL to implement a fee-based e-mail service. The e-mail service will be based on the technology of Goodmail Systems and will assure the authenticity of the message-sender. The service appears to have benefits for...

  • Net giants unite to battle spam. Bond, Paul // Hollywood Reporter -- International Edition;4/29/2003, Vol. 378 Issue 21, p8 

    Setting aside their competitive instincts, Microsoft Corp., America Online Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. have formed a coalition in the year 2003 to fight against unsolicited commercial e-mail, better known as spam. The trio intends on driving technical standards and industry guidelines for the treatment...

  • Special delivery. King, Ben // New Media Age;3/2/2006, p21 

    This article discusses the possible effects of the plans of AOL and Yahoo!, to charge the companies to deliver e-mails to their users, on the marketing community. The plans states that both AOL and Yahoo! will use technology from Goodmail Systems and advertisers will pay for the messages they...

  • AOL tests anti-spam technology. Roberts, Paul // Network World;1/26/2004, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p16 

    Reports on AOL's new technology to crack down a common spammer tool. Use of forged sender addresses in bypassing blacklists and tricking unsuspecting recipients; Trial of an e-mail protocol Sender Permitted Form (SPF) across its subscribers; Benefit of SPF in allowing e-mail providers to...

  • The Spam Stops Here. D.J. // Working Mother;May2000, p30 

    Answers queries about spam. How to keep email inbox junk free; Ending unsolicited email messages.

  • Spam 102. Oriez, Charles // Information Executive;Jan2000, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p3 

    Presents tactics on how to prevent customers from spamming electronic mail messages. Responsibility of the internet service providers; Basics of complaining about spam; The spam fighting tools.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics